Motivating Employees to Share their Failures in Knowledge Management Systems: Anonymity and Culture

Article English OPEN
Heurta, Esperanza ; Salter, Stephen B. ; Lewis, Philip A. ; Yeow, Pamela (2012)
  • Subject: H | H1

This study investigates the effect of the type of information to be disclosed and the possibility of sharing the information anonymously on the intention to share information. Data for the experiment were collected in two individualist (UK and US) and two collectivist (Chile and Mexico) countries to evaluate the influence of culture on information sharing patterns. The study finds that although anonymity has no influence on the intention to share successes, the intention to share failures increases when the information is shared anonymously. Further, participants from collectivist (versus individualist) cultures are more likely to share failures. However, the influence of anonymity and culture is limited. Failures are still shared at lower levels than successes, even in anonymous conditions and in collectivist cultures.
  • References (58)
    58 references, page 1 of 6

    Alavi, M., and D. E. Leidner. 1999. Knowledge management systems: Issues, challenges, and benefits. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 1 (7): 1-37.

    Alavi, M., and D. E. Leidner. 2001. Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly 25 (1): 107-136.

    Ardichvili, A., M. Maurer, W. Li, T. Wentling, and R. Stuedemann. 2006. Cultural influences on knowledge sharing through online communities of practice. Journal of Knowledge Management 10 (1): 94-107.

    Arnold, V., N. Clark, P. A. Collier, S. A. Leech, and S. G. Sutton. 2005. An investigation of knowledgebased systems' use to promote judgment consistency in multicultural firm environments. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting 2: 33-59.

    Bearden, W. O., R. B. Money, and J. L. Nevins. 2006. Multidimensional versus unidimensional measures in assessing national culture values: The Hofstede VSM 94 example. Journal of Business Research 59 (2): 195-203.

    Bock, G.-W., R. W. Zmud, Y.-G. Kim, and J.-N. Lee. 2005. Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: Examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological forces, and organizational climate. MIS Quarterly 29 (1): 87-111.

    Bordia, P. 1997. Face-to-face versus computer-mediated communication: A synthesis of the experimental literature. Journal of Business Communication 34 (1): 99-120.

    Burgess, D. 2005. What motivates employees to transfer knowledge outside their work unit? Journal of Business Communication 42 (4): 324-348.

    Charness, G., and M. Rabin. 2002. Understanding social preferences with simple tests. Quarterly Journal of Economics 117 (3): 817-869.

    Chow, C. W., F. J. Deng, and J. L. Ho. 2000. The openness of knowledge sharing within organizations: A comparative study of the United States and the People's Republic of China. Journal of Management Accounting Research 112 (1): 65-95.

  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark