Comparison of Accelerometry Cut Points for Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior in Preschool Children: A Validation Study

Article English OPEN
Hislop, Jane ; Bulley, Catherine ; Mercer, Tom ; Reilly, J J (2012)
  • Publisher: Human Kinetics
  • Subject:
    mesheuropmc: human activities

This study compared accelerometry cut points for sedentary behavior, light and moderate to vigorous intensity activity (MVPA) against a criterion measure, the Children’s Activity Rating Scale (CARS), in preschool children. Actigraph accelerometry data were collected from 31 children (4.4 ± 0.8 yrs) during one hour of free-play. Video data were coded using the CARS. Cut points by Pate et al., van Cauwenberghe et al., Sirard et al. and Puyau et al. were applied to calculate time spent in sedentary, light and MVPA. Repeated-measures ANOVA and paired t tests tested differences between the cut points and the CARS. Bland and Altman plots tested agreement between the cut points and the CARS. No significant difference was found between the CARS and the Puyau et al. cut points for sedentary, light and MVPA or between the CARS and the Sirard et al. cut point for MVPA. The present study suggests that the Sirard et al. and Puyau et al. cut points provide accurate group-level estimates of MVPA in preschool children.
  • References (35)
    35 references, page 1 of 4

    1. ActiGraph LLC. GT1M Technical Details [Internet]. 2007. [cited 2007 Mar 8]. Available from:

    2. Baquet, G., G. Stratton, P.E. Van, and S. Berthoin. Improving physical activity assessment in prepubertal children with high-frequency accelerometry monitoring: A methodological issue. Prev. Med. 44(2):143-147, 2007. PubMed doi:10.1016/j. ypmed.2006.10.004

    3. Biddle, S.J., N. Pearson, G.M. Ross, and R. Braithwaite. Tracking of sedentary behaviours of young people: a systematic review. Prev. Med. 51(5):345-351, 2010. PubMed doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2010.07.018

    4. Bland, J.M., and D.G. Altman. Statistical Methods for Assessing Agreement Between Two Methods of Clinical Measurement. Lancet. XXX:307-310, 1986. PubMed doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(86)90837-8

    5. Brage, S., N. Wedderkopp, P.W. Franks, L.B. Andersen, and K. Froberg. Reexamination of validity and reliability of the CSA monitor in walking and running. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 35(8):1447-1454, 2003. PubMed doi:10.1249/01.MSS.0000079078.62035.EC

    6. Chief Medical Officers of England, Scotland, Wales and Ireland. Start Active, Stay Active. A report on physical activity for health from the four home countries' Chief Medical Officers. [Internet]. London: Department of Health; 2011. [cited 2012 Feb 2]. Available from: PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_128209

    7. Cliff, D.P., and A.D. Okely. Comparison of two sets of accelerometer cut-off points for calculating moderate-to-vigorous physical activity in young children. J Phys Act Health. 4:509-513, 2007. PubMed

    8. Cliff, D.P., J.J. Reilly, and A.D. Okely. Methodological considerations in using accelerometers to assess habitual physical activity in children aged 0-5 years. J. Sci. Med. Sport. 12(5):557-567, 2009. PubMed doi:10.1016/j.jsams.2008.10.008

    9. Edwardson, C.L., and T. Gorely. Epoch Length and Its Effect on Physical Activity Intensity. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 42(5):928-934, 2010. PubMed doi:10.1249/ MSS.0b013e3181c301f5

    10. Evenson, K.R., D.J. Catellier, K. Gill, K.S. Ondrak, and R.G. McMurray. Calibration of two objective measures of physical activity for children. J Sports Sci. 26(14):1557-1565, 2008. PubMed

  • Metrics
    views in OpenAIRE
    views in local repository
    downloads in local repository

    The information is available from the following content providers:

    From Number Of Views Number Of Downloads
    Queen Margaret University eResearch - IRUS-UK 0 72
Share - Bookmark