Ability of dyslexic and control teenagers to sustain attention and inhibit responses

Article English OPEN
Moores, Elisabeth ; Andrade, Jackie (2000)

Dyslexia and attentional difficulty have often been linked, but little is known of the nature of the supposed attentional disorder. The Sustained Attention to Response Task (SART: Robertson, Manly, Andrade, Baddeley and Yiend, 1997) was designed as a measure of sustained attention and requires the withholding of responses to rare (one in nine) targets. To investigate the nature of the attentional disorder in dyslexia, this paper reports two studies which examined the performance of teenagers with dyslexia and their age-matched controls on the SART, the squiggle SART (a modification of the SART using novel and unlabellable stimuli rather than digits) and the go-gap-stop test of response inhibition (GGST). Teenagers with dyslexia made significantly more errors than controls on the original SART, but not the squiggle SART. There were no group differences on the GGST. After controlling for speed of reaction time in a sequential multiple regression predicting SART false alarms, false alarms on the GGST accounted for up to 22% extra variance in the control groups (although less on the squiggle SART) but negligible amounts of variance in the dyslexic groups. We interpret the results as reflecting a stimulus recognition automaticity deficit in dyslexia, rather than a sustained attention deficit. Furthermore, results suggest that response inhibition is an important component of performance on the standard SART when stimuli are recognised automatically.
  • References (27)
    27 references, page 1 of 3

    American Psychiatric Association (1987). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 3rd edition, Revised. Washington DC: American Psychiatric Association.

    Augur, J. (1985). Guidelines for teachers, parents and learners. In M.J. Snowling (Ed.), Children's written language difficulties: Assessment and management. London: Routledge. p147-169.

    Badian, N.A. (1994). Preschool prediction: Orthographic and phonological skills and reading. Annals of Dyslexia, 44, 3-25.

    Barkley, R.A. (1994). Delayed responding and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: toward a unified theory. In D.K. Routh (Ed.), Disruptive behavior disorders in children: Essays in honor of Herbert Quay (p11-57). New York: Plenum. Cited in Chapter 4 in Attention Memory and Executive Function, G.R.Lyon and N.A.Krasnegor (eds.), Paul Brookes Publishing Co., Maple Press Company, York: Pennsylvania.

    Brannan, J.R. and Williams, M.C. (1987). Allocation of visual attention in good and poor readers. Perception and Psychophysics, 41, 23-28.

    Cohen, J., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M. and Provost, J. PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 25, 257-271.

    Denckla, M.B. and Rudel, R.G. (1976). Rapid 'Automatized' Naming (R.A.N.): Dyslexia differentiated from other learning disabilities. Neuropsychologia, 14, 471-479.

    Dykman, R.A., Ackerman, P.T. and Oglesby, D.M. (1979). Selective and Sustained Attention in hyperactive, learning-disabled and normal boys. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 167, 288-297.

    Ellis, N. (1981). Visual and name encoding in dyslexic children. Psychological Research, 43, 201-18.

    Fischer, B. and Weber, H. (1990). Saccadic reaction times of dyslexic and age-matched normal subjects. Perception, 19, 805-818.

  • Metrics
    views in OpenAIRE
    views in local repository
    downloads in local repository

    The information is available from the following content providers:

    From Number Of Views Number Of Downloads
    Aston Publications Explorer - IRUS-UK 0 42
Share - Bookmark