Nurses’ and midwives’ information behaviour: a review of literature from 1998 to 2014

Article English OPEN
Ebenezer, C.M. (2015)
  • Publisher: Emerald

Purpose\ud – This paper aims to provide an overview of recent literature on nurses’ and midwives’ information behaviour, with a particular focus on sources used and barriers encountered.\ud \ud Design/methodology/approach\ud – Comprehensive searching was undertaken and an analysis of the appropriate literature carried out.\ud \ud Findings\ud – Practitioners within the nursing profession have a marked preference for interactive and human sources of information. They habitually associate information seeking with professional development rather than with clinical practice. Lack of time is the most frequently reported problem; also, they frequently lack confidence in searching and appraising the professional literature and in applying research in practice. Cultural factors may inhibit information seeking in the workplace, and access to appropriate information technology may be limited.\ud \ud Practical implications\ud – As a group, nurses and midwives present significant challenges to health library and information professionals seeking to design services to meet their needs. A perceived lack of access to information resources may be associated with pervasive information literacy skill deficits, with the inability to undertake critical appraisal of material that is retrieved, or with the lack of a workplace culture that is supportive of information seeking. To reach nurses and midwives, more than diligent marketing is required; library and information professionals need to work closely with the holders of nursing and midwifery research, practice development and educational roles within their institutions on “embedded”, specific information initiatives.\ud \ud Originality/value\ud – An overview of recent work is presented on the information behaviour of nurses and midwives within developed economies, focusing particularly on the UK. It may be of interest and value to health librarians and to nursing and midwifery educators in facilitating evidence-based practice.
  • References (69)
    69 references, page 1 of 7

    Anderson, A. S., & Klemm, P. (2008). The Internet: friend or foe when providing patient education? Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing, 12(1), 55 W64.

    Banning, M. (2008). A review of clinical decision making: models and current research. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 17(2), 187 9W5. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01791.x

    Beke- ) readiness for evidence-based practice: a multidisciplinary project. Journal of Hospital Librarianship, 8(4), 440 4W48.

    Bertulis, R. (2008). Barriers to accessing evidence-based information. Nursing Standard, 22(36), 35 3W9. )

    25(3), 186 1W97. doi:10.1111/j.1471-1842.2007.00755.x

    Blair, J. (2006). The use of the internet by learning disability nurses in their practice. Tizard Learning Disability Review, 11(2), 35 W44.

    Bogossian, F. E., & Kellett, S. E. M. (2010). Barriers to electronic portfolio access in the clinical setting. Nurse Education Today, 30(8), 768 7W2. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2010.02.003

    Bond, C. S. (2009). Nurses, computers and pre-registration education. Nurse Education Today, 29(7), 731 4W. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2009.02.014

    Carney, P. A., Poor, D. A., Schifferdecker, K. E., Gephart, D. S., Brooks, W. B., & Nierenberg, D. W. (2004). Computer use among community-based primary care physician preceptors. Academic Medicine, 79(6), 580 5W90. Retrieved from ng_Community_Based_Primary_Care.17.aspx

    Carrion, M., Woods, P., & Norman, I. (2004). Barriers to research utilisation among forensic mental health nurses. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 41(6), 613 9W. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2004.01.006

  • Metrics
    views in OpenAIRE
    views in local repository
    downloads in local repository

    The information is available from the following content providers:

    From Number Of Views Number Of Downloads
    White Rose Research Online - IRUS-UK 0 169
Share - Bookmark