Reliability of two-dimensional video assessment of frontal plane dynamic knee valgus during common athletic screening tasks

Article English OPEN
Munro, AG ; Herrington, LC ; Carolan, M
  • Publisher: Human Kinetics
  • Subject: health_and_wellbeing

Context: Two-dimensional (2D) video analysis of frontal-plane dynamic knee valgus during common athletic\ud screening tasks has been purported to identify individuals who may be at high risk of suffering knee injuries\ud such as anterior cruciate ligament tear or patellofemoral pain syndrome. Although the validity of 2D video\ud analysis has been studied, the associated reliability and measurement error have not. Objective: To assess the\ud reliability and associated measurement error of a 2D video analysis of lower limb dynamic valgus. Design:\ud Reliability study. Participants: 20 recreationally active university students (10 women age 21.5 ± 2.3 y, height\ud 170.1 ± 6.1 cm, weight 66.2 ± 10.2 kg, and 10 men age 22.6 ± 3.1 y, height 177.9 ± 6.0 cm, weight 75.8 ± 7.9\ud kg). Main Outcome Measurement: Within-day and between-days reliability and measurement-error values\ud of 2D frontal-plane projection angle (FPPA) during common screening tasks. Interventions: Participants\ud performed single-leg squat and drop jump and single-leg landings from a standard 28-cm step with standard\ud 2D digital video camera assessment. Results: Women demonstrated significantly higher FPPA in all tests\ud except the left single-leg squat. Within-day ICCs showed good reliability and ranged from .59 to .88, and\ud between-days ICCs were good to excellent, ranging from .72 to .91. Standard error of measurement and smallest\ud detectable difference values ranged from 2.72° to 3.01° and 7.54° to 8.93°, respectively. Conclusions: 2D\ud FPPA has previously been shown to be valid and has now also been shown to be a reliable measure of lower\ud extremity dynamic knee valgus. Using the measurement error values presented along with previously published\ud normative data, clinicians can now make informed judgments about individual performance and changes in\ud performance resulting from interventions.
  • References (20)
    20 references, page 1 of 2

    1. Starkey C. Injuries and illnesses in the National Basketball Association: a 10-year perspective. J Athl Train. 2000;35:161-167.

    2. Hootman JM, Dick R, Agel J. Epidemiology of collegiate injuries for 15 sports: summary and recommendations for injury prevention initiatives. J Athl Train. 2007;42:311- 319.

    3. Ireland ML. Anterior cruciate ligament injury in female athletes: epidemiology. J Athl Train. 1999;34:150-154.

    4. Hewett TE, Myer GD, Ford KR, et al. Biomechanical measures of neuromuscular control and valgus loading of the knee predict anterior cruciate ligament injury risk in female athletes: a prospective study. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33:492-501.

    5. Willson JD, Davis IS. Utility of the frontal plane projection angle in females with patellofemoral pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2008;38:606-615.

    6. Souza RB, Powers CM. Differences in hip kinematics, muscle strength, and muscle activation between subjects with and without patellofemoral pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2009;39:12-19.

    7. Willson JD, Ireland ML, Davis I. Core strength and lower extremity alignment during single leg squats. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006;38:945-952.

    8. Zeller BL, McCrory JL, Kibler WB, Uhl TL. Differences in kinematics and electromyographic activity between men and women during the single-legged squat. Am J Sports Med. 2003;31:449-456.

    9. Noyes FR, Barber-Westin SD, Fleckenstein C, Walsh C, West J. The drop-jump screening test: difference in lower limb control by gender and effect of neuromuscular training in female athletes. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33:197-207.

    10. Herrington L, Munro A. Drop jump landing knee valgus angle; normative data in a physically active population. Phys Ther Sport. In press.

  • Metrics
    0
    views in OpenAIRE
    0
    views in local repository
    2,111
    downloads in local repository

    The information is available from the following content providers:

    From Number Of Views Number Of Downloads
    University of Salford Institutional Repository - IRUS-UK 0 2,111
Share - Bookmark