The cell and the corridor: imprisonment as waiting, and waiting as mobile

Article English OPEN
Armstrong, Sarah (2018)

Imprisonment is the exemplary symbol of waiting, of being stuck in a space and for a time not of our choosing. This concept of waiting is perfectly represented by the image of the prison cell. In this paper, I contrast the cell with the less familiar imagery of the corridor, a space of prison that evokes and involves mobility. Through this juxtaposition, I aim to show that prisons are as much places of movement as stillness with associated implications for penal power and purpose. I argue that the incomplete imaginary of prison as a cell (and waiting as still) may operate as a necessary fiction that both sustains and undermines its legitimacy. By incorporating the corridor into the penal imaginary, key premises about how prisons do and should work, specifically by keeping prisoners busy, and how prison time flows and is experienced, are disrupted.
  • References (13)
    13 references, page 1 of 2

    Armstrong S (2010) Prison's prisms: policy's objects in Scottish penal reform. Conference Paper. Interpretive Policy Association Annual Meeting (June). Grenoble, France. Available at: 2881/outputs/read/c223da76-4a78-4d32-86ee-d8f5c2b22cd5

    Armstrong S (2009) Fixing Scotland's remand problem. Research Report, SCCJR No. 02/09. Available at:

    Armstrong S and Weaver B (2013) Persistent punishment: user views of short prison sentences. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice 52(3): 285-305.

    Armstrong S, Malloch M, Nellis M and Norris P (2011) Evaluating the Effectiveness of Home Detention Curfew and Open Prison in Scotland. Scottish Government Social Research Report No. 32/2011. Edinburgh: Scottish Government.

    Pallot J and Piacentini L (2012) Gender, Geography and Punishment: The Experience of Women Prisoners in Carceral Russia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Phillips J (1998) Sade in the corridor. Nottingham French Studies 37(2): 26-36.

    Pratt J (2000) The return of the wheelbarrow men; or, the arrival of postmodern penality? British Journal of Criminology 40(1): 127-145.

    Reed A (2010) Hope on Remand. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute vol. 17: 527- 544.

    Rhodes L (2004) Total Confinement: Madness and Reason in the Maximum Security Prison. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Riles A (2006) Introduction: In Response. In: Riles A (Ed) Documents. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark