Dependence, independence or inter-dependence? Revisiting the concepts of 'care' and 'dependency'

Article English OPEN
Fine, M ; Glendinning, C (2005)

Research and theory on 'dependency' and 'care-giving' have to date proceeded along largely separate lines, with little sense that they are exploring and explaining different aspects of the same phenomenon. Research on 'care', initially linked to feminism during the early 1980s, has revealed and exposed to public gaze what was hitherto assumed to be a 'natural' female activity. Conversely, disability activists and writers who have promoted a social model of disability have seen the language of and the policy focus upon 'care' as oppressive and objectifying. 'Dependency' is an equally contested concept: sociologists have scrutinised the social construction of dependency, politicians have ascribed negative connotations of passivity, while medical and social policy discourse employs the term in a positivist sense as a measure of physical need for professional intervention. Autonomy and independence, in contrast, are promoted as universal and largely unproblematic goals. These contrasting perspectives have led social theory, research and policies to separate and segregate the worlds of 'carers' from those for whom they 'care'. Drawing on the work of Kittay and others, this paper explores the ways in which sociological perspectives can develop new understanding of the social contexts of 'care' and 'dependence'.
  • References (81)
    81 references, page 1 of 9

    Arber, S., Gilbert, N. and Evandrou, M. 1988. Gender, household composition and receipt of domiciliary services by the elderly disabled. Journal of Social Policy, 17, 2, 153-76.

    Arber, S. and Gilbert, N. 1989. Men : the forgotten carers. Sociology, 23, 1, 111-8.

    Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) 1999. Disability, Ageing and Carers, Australia 1998 : Summary of Findings. Publication 4430.0, ABS, Canberra.

    Baldock, J. 1997. Social care in old age : more than a funding problem. Social Policy and Administration, 31, 1, 73-89.

    Baldock, J. and Ungerson, C. 1996. Money, care and consumption : families in the new mixed economy of social care. In Jones, H. and Millar, J. (eds), The Politics of the Family. Avebury, Aldershot, Hampshire, 167-87.

    Baldwin, S. and Twigg, J. 1991. Women and community care. In Maclean, M. and Groves, D. (eds), Women's Issues in Social Policy. Routledge, London, 117-35.

    Baltes, M. 1996. The Many Faces of Dependency in Old Age. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Bowden, P. 1997. Caring : Gender-Sensitive Ethics. Routledge, London.

    Braithwaite, V. A. 1989. Bound to Care. Allen and Unwin, Sydney.

    Brisenden, S. 1989. A charter for personal care. Progress, Disablement Income Group, London, 9-10.

  • Metrics
    views in OpenAIRE
    views in local repository
    downloads in local repository

    The information is available from the following content providers:

    From Number Of Views Number Of Downloads
    White Rose Research Online - IRUS-UK 0 2,173
Share - Bookmark