Experiences of using a wearable camera to record activity, participation and health-related behaviours: Qualitative reflections of using the Sensecam

Article English OPEN
Wilson, Gemma ; Jones, Derek ; Schofield, Patricia ; Martin, Denis J. (2016)
  • Publisher: SAGE Publications
  • Journal: Digital health, volume 2 (eissn: 2055-2076)
  • Related identifiers: pmc: PMC6001196, doi: 10.1177/2055207616682628
  • Subject: older adult | life-logging | usability | Sensecam | acceptance | qualitative | X900 | Wearable camera | Original Research | L900

Abstract\ud Objective: Upcoming technology is changing the way that we are able to collect data looking into activity, social participation\ud and health behaviours. Wearable cameras are one form of technology that allows us to automatically record a collection of\ud passive images, building a visual diary of the user’s day. Whilst acknowledging the usefulness of wearable cameras in\ud research, it is also important to understand individuals’ experiences whilst using them. The aim of this study was to explore\ud the acceptance, experience and usability of a wearable camera (Microsoft_ Sensecam) to record the day-to-day activity and\ud social participation of older people.\ud Methods: A total of 18 older adults, who had worn the wearable camera for seven days, took part in semi-structured\ud interviews.\ud Results: Four themes emerged from the findings: ‘Intrusiveness’; ‘Importance of others’; ‘Remembering the wearable\ud camera’; and ‘Ease of use’.\ud Conclusions: Individuals’ expectations and experiences of using the wearable camera differed considerably. Participants\ud believed that the wearable camera would be intrusive, difficult to use and would evoke public reaction; however, these\ud worries were not borne out in experience. Individuals typically forgot about the presence of the wearable camera during\ud use, remembering it only sporadically. One drawback to its use is that some participants were cautious of using the camera\ud when around others, which impacted the amount of time the camera was worn, and, therefore, the nature of the data\ud recorded. Design issues of the Sensecam were also a problem for the older adults in the study and affected their interaction\ud with the technology.
  • References (40)
    40 references, page 1 of 4

    1. Bolger N, Davis A and Rafaeli E. Diary methods: capturing life as it is lived. Ann Rev Psychol 2003; 54: 579 616.

    2. Reis HT. Domains of experience: investigating relationship processes from three perspectives. In: Erber R and Gilmour R (eds) Theoretical frameworks for personal relationships. New Jersey USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc, 1994, pp.87 110.

    3. McGlyyn EA, Damberg CL, Kerr EA, et al. Health Information Systems: Design Issues and Analytic Applications. Santa Monica USA: RAND, 1998.

    4. Cyarto EV, Myers AM and Tudor-Locke C. Pedometer accuracy in nursing home and community-dwelling older adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2004; 36: 205 209.

    5. Storti KL, Pettee KK, Brach JS, et al. Gait speed and step-count monitor accuracy in community-dwelling older adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2008; 40: 59.

    6. Kerr J, Marshall SJ, Godbole S, et al. Using the SenseCam to improve classifications of sedentary behavior in freeliving settings. Am J Prev Med 2013; 44: 290 296.

    7. Doherty A, Hodges S, King A, et al. Wearable cameras in health. Am J Prev Med 2013; 44: 320 323.

    8. Caprani N, Gurrin C and O'Connor NE. I like to log: a questionnaire study towards accessible lifelogging for older users. In: Proceedings of the 12th international ACM SIG ACCESS conference on computers and accessibility, Orlando FL, USA, 25-27 October 2010, pp.263- 264. New York: ASME.

    9. Lupton D. Quantifying the body: monitoring and measuring health in the age of mHealth technologies. Crit Public Health 2013; 23: 393 403.

    10. Bell G and Gemmell J. Total recall: how the e-memory revolution will change everything. New York USA: Dutton, 2009.

  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark