Interocular transfer of spatial adaptation is weak at low spatial frequencies

Article English OPEN
Baker, Daniel ; Meese, Timothy (2012)
  • Publisher: Elsevier BV
  • Journal: Vision Research, volume 63, pages 81-87 (issn: 0042-6989)
  • Related identifiers: doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2012.05.002
  • Subject: 2731 | 2809 | Ophthalmology | Sensory Systems
    mesheuropmc: eye diseases | genetic structures

Adapting one eye to a high contrast grating reduces sensitivity to similar target gratings shown to the same eye, and also to those shown to the opposite eye. According to the textbook account, interocular transfer (IOT) of adaptation is around 60% of the within-eye effect. However, most previous studies on this were limited to using high spatial frequencies, sustained presentation, and criterion-dependent methods for assessing threshold. Here, we measure IOT across a wide range of spatiotemporal frequencies, using a criterion-free 2AFC method. We find little or no IOT at low spatial frequencies, consistent with other recent observations. At higher spatial frequencies, IOT was present, but weaker than previously reported (around 35%, on average, at 8c/deg). Across all conditions, monocular adaptation raised thresholds by around a factor of 2, and observers showed normal binocular summation, demonstrating that they were not binocularly compromised. These findings prompt a reassessment of our understanding of the binocular architecture implied by interocular adaptation. In particular, the output of monocular channels may be available to perceptual decision making at low spatial frequencies.
  • References (38)
    38 references, page 1 of 4

    Anderson, P. A., & Movshon, J. A. (1989). Binocular combination of contrast signals. Vision Res, 29: 1115-32.

    Baker, D. H., Meese, T. S., Mansouri, B., & Hess, R. F. (2007). Binocular summation of contrast remains intact in strabismic amblyopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 48: 5332-5338.

    Bj¿rklund, R. A., & Magnussen, S. (1981). A study of interocular transfer of spatial adaptation. Perception, 10: 511-8.

    Blake, R., & Cormack, R. H. (1979). On utrocular discrimination. Perception & Psychophysics, 26: 53-68.

    Blake, R., Overton, R., & Lema-Stern, S. (1981). Interocular transfer of visual aftereffects. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform, 7: 367-81.

    Blakemore, C., & Campbell, F. W. (1969). On the existence of neurones in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images. J Physiol, 203: 237- 60.

    Campbell, F. W., & Green, D. G. (1965). Monocular Versus Binocular Visual Acuity. Nature, 208: 191Ð192.

    Cass, J., Johnson, A. M., Bex, P. J., & Alais, D. (2012). Orientation-specificity of adaptation within and between the eyes. PLoS One, forthcoming.

    Falconbridge, M., Ware, A., & MacLeod, D. I. A. (2010). Imperceptibly rapid contrast modulations processed in cortex: Evidence from psychophysics. J Vis, 10(8): art. 21. doi:10.1167/10.8.21

    Finney, D. J. (1971). Probit Analysis. Cambridge University Press.

  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark