Improving initiation, decision and execution phases for vertical handover in heterogeneous wireless mobile networks

Doctoral thesis English OPEN
Khattab, OAO
  • Subject: media_dig_tech_and_creative_econ

One of the challenging issues in Next Generation Wireless Systems (NGWS) is seamless \ud Vertical Handover (VHO) during the mobility between different types of technologies \ud (3GPP and non-3GPP) such as Global System for Mobile Communication (GSM), \ud Wireless Fidelity (Wi-Fi), Worldwide Interoperability for Microwave Access (WiMAX), \ud Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS) and Long Term Evolution \ud (LTE). Therefore, the telecommunication operators are required to develop an\ud interoperability strategy for these different types of existing networks to get the best \ud connection anywhere, anytime without interruption of the ongoing sessions. In order to \ud identify this problem accurately, the research study presented in this thesis provides four \ud surveys about VHO approaches found in the literature. In these surveys, we classify the \ud existing VHO approaches into categories based on the available VHO techniques for \ud which we present their objectives and performances issues. After that, we propose an \ud optimised VHO approach based on the VHO approaches that have been studied in the \ud literature and take into consideration the research problems and conclusions which are\ud arisen in our surveys. The proposed approach demonstrates better performance (packet \ud loss, latency and signaling cost), less VHO connection failure (probability of minimising \ud VHO reject sessions), less complexity and an enhanced VHO compared with that found\ud in the literature. It consists of a procedure which is implemented by an algorithm. \ud The proposed procedure of loose coupling and Mobile Internet Protocol version 4 \ud (MIPv4) provides early buffering for new data packets to minimise VHO packet loss and \ud latency. Analysis and simulation of the proposed procedure show that the VHO packet \ud loss and latency are significantly reduced compared with previous MIPv6 procedures \ud found in the literature.\ud The proposed algorithm is composed of two main parts: Handover Initiation and \ud Optimum Radio Access Technologies (RATs) list of priority. The first part includes two \ud main types of VHO and gives priority to imperative sessions over alternative sessions. III\ud This part is also responsible for deciding when and where to perform the handover by \ud choosing the best RATs from the multiple ones available. Then, it passes them to the \ud decision phase. This results in reducing the signaling cost and the inevitable degradation \ud in Quality of Service (QoS) as a result of avoiding unnecessary handover processes. The \ud second part defines RATs list of priority to minimise VHO connection failure. Analysis \ud and simulation based performance evaluations then demonstrate that the proposed \ud algorithm outperforms the traditional algorithms in terms of: (a) the probability of VHO\ud connection failure as a result of using the optimum RATs list of priority and (b) the\ud signaling cost and the inevitable degradation in QoS as a result of avoiding unnecessary \ud handover processes.
  • References (78)
    78 references, page 1 of 8

    [34] Cooklev, T. (2004). The IEEE Standard for WLAN: IEEE 802.11. In Jennifer, L (Ed), Wireless Communication Standards:A Study of IEEE 802.11, 802.15, 802.16 (pp. 45-132). US: Wiley-IEEE Standards Association.

    [35] Torad, M.; El Qassas, A.; Al Henawi, H.;, “Comparison between LTE and WiMAX Based on System Level Simulation Using OPNET Modeler (Release 16),” 28th National Radio Science Conference 2011 (NRSC 2011), 26-28 Apr 2011, pp. 1-9.

    [36] David, M.S.; Jose, F.M.; Jorge, C.P.; Daniel, C.; Salvador, G.; Narc´ıs, C.;, “On the Way Towards Fourth-Generation Mobile:3GPP LTE and LTE-Advanced,” Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, vol. 2009, no. 4, 2009, pp. 1- 10. Chang, J.M.; Abichar, Z.; Chau-Yun, H.;, “WiMAX or LTE: Who Will Lead the Broadband Mobile Internet?,” IT Professional, vol. 12, no. 3, May-Jun 2010, pp. 26- 32.

    [38] Seddigh, N.; Nandy, B.; Makkar, R.; Beaumont, J.F.;, “Security Advances and Challenges in 4G Wireless Networks,” 8th Annual International Conference on Privacy Security and Trust 2010 (PST 2010), 17-19 Aug 2010, pp. 62-71.

    [39] Sengar, S.S.; Tyagi, N.; Singh, A.P.;, “A Survey on WiMAX-3G interworking,” 3rd International Conferenceon Communication Software and Networks 2011 (ICCSN 2011), 27-29 May 2011, pp. 54-58.

    [40] Ahmadi, S.;, “An Overview of Next-Generation Mobile WiMAX Technology,” IEEE Communication Magazine, vol. 47, no. 6, Jun 2009, pp. 84-98.

    [41] Papapanagiotou, I.; Toumpakaris, D.; Jungwon, L.; Devetsikiotis, M.;, “A Survey on Next Generation Mobile WiMAX Networks: Objectives, Features and Technical Challenges,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 11, no. 4, Fourth Quarter 2009, pp. 3-18.

    [50] Mccann, S.; Groting, W.; Pandolfi, A.; Hepworth, E.;, “Next Generation Multimode Terminals,” 5th International Conference on 3G Mobile Communication Technologies, 2004, pp. 143-147.

    [51] 3GPP TR 25.814 v7.1.0, “Physical Layer Aspects for Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (UTRA) Release 7”.

    [52] Khan, M.M.A.; Ismail, M.F.; Dimyati, K.;, “Seamless Handover between WiMAX and UMTS,” 9th Malaysia International Conference on Communications 2009 (MICC 2009), 15-17 Dec 2009 pp. 826-830.

  • Related Research Results (1)
  • Similar Research Results (1)
  • Metrics
    views in OpenAIRE
    views in local repository
    downloads in local repository

    The information is available from the following content providers:

    From Number Of Views Number Of Downloads
    University of Salford Institutional Repository - IRUS-UK 0 511
Share - Bookmark