1 Illes J, Kirschen MP, Edwards E, et al. Incidental findings in brain imaging research. Science 2006;311:783-4.
2 Wolf SM, Lawrenz FP, Nelson CA, et al. Managing incidental findings in human subjects research: analysis and recommendations. J Law Med Ethics 2008;36:219-48.
3 Warlow C. The new religion: screening at your parish church. BMJ 2009;338:b1940.
4 Stone HJ. Incidentalomas-clinical correlation and translational science required. N Engl J Med 2006;26:2748-9.
5 Wellcome Trust, Medical Research Council, Opinion Leader. Assessing public attitudes to health related findings in research. 2012. www.wellcome.ac.uk/stellent/groups/ corporatesite/@msh_grants/documents/web_document/wtvm055196.pdf.
6 Illes J, Kirschen MP, Karetsky K, et al. Discovery and disclosure of incidental findings in neuroimaging research. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004;20:743-7.
7 Booth TC, Waldman AD, Wardlaw JM, Taylor SA, Jackson A. Management of incidental findings during imaging research in “healthy” volunteers: current UK practice. Br J Radiol 2012;85:11-21.
8 Booth TC, Jackson A, Wardlaw JM, Taylor SA, Waldman AD. Incidental findings found in “healthy” volunteers during imaging performed for research: current legal and ethical implications. Br J Radiol 2010;83:456-65.
9 Heinemann T, von Kummer R; German Society of Neuroradiology. Response of the German Society of Neuroradiology to the guideline “ethically appropriate reaction to incidental imaging findings in brain research,” suggested by Thomas Heinemann, Institut für Wissenschaft und Ethik, and Christian Hoppe, Klinik für Epileptologie, Universität Bonn, Germany, on January 9, 2009. Klin Neuroradiol 2009;19:108-10.