Negotiating the dynamics of uncomfortable knowledge: The case of dual use and synthetic biology

Article, Unknown English OPEN
Marris, Claire ; Jefferson, Catherine ; Lentzos, Filippa (2014)
  • Publisher: Palgrave Macmillan
  • Journal: Biosocieties (issn: 1745-8552, vol: 9, pp: 393-420)
  • Related identifiers: doi: 10.1057/biosoc.2014.32, pmc: PMC4255065
  • Subject: innovation | synthetic biology | R | Forum Article | biosecurity | Health Policy | dual use | strategic ignorance | Health(social science) | H1 | strategic ignorance; synthetic biology; dual use; biosecurity; science and technology studies (STS); innovation | science and technology studies (STS)

10.03.15 KB. Ok to add published version to spiral, OA paper Institutions need to ignore some knowledge in order to function. This is uncomfortable knowledge because it undermines the ability of those institutions to pursue their goals (Rayner, 2012). We identify three bodies of knowledge that are relevant to understandings of the dual use threat posed by synthetic biology but are excluded from related policy discussions. We demonstrate how these unknown knowns constitute uncomfortable knowledge because they disrupt the simplified worldview that underpins contemporary discourse on the potential misuse of synthetic biology by malign actors. We describe how these inconvenient truths have been systematically ignored and argue that this is because they are perceived as a threat by organisations involved in the promotion of synthetic biology as well as by those involved in managing biosecurity risks. This has led to a situation where concerns about the biosecurity threat posed by synthetic biology are not only exaggerated, but are, more importantly, misplaced. This, in turn, means that related policies are misdirected and unlikely to have much impact. We focus on the dynamics of discussions about synthetic biology and dual use to demonstrate how the same knowns that are denied or dismissed as unknown knowns in certain circumstances are sometimes mobilised as known knowns by the same category of actors in a different context, when this serves to sustain the goals of the individuals and institutions involved. Based on our own experience, we argue that negotiating the dynamics of uncomfortable knowledge is a difficult, but necessary, component of meaningful transdisciplinary collaborations.
  • References (64)
    64 references, page 1 of 7

    Balmer, B. (2006) A secret formula, a rogue patent and public knowledge about nerve gas: Secrecy as a spatialepistemic tool. Social Studies of Science 36(5): 691-722.

    Balmer, B. (2012) Secrecy and Science: A Historical Sociology of Biological and Chemical Warfare. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.

    Ben Ouagrham-Gormley, S. (2012) Barriers to bioweapons: Intangible obstacles to proliferation. International Security 36(4): 80-114.

    Ben Ouagrham-Gormley, S. (2014) Barriers to Bioweapons: The Challenges of Expertise and Organization for Weapons Development. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Ben Ouagrham-Gormley, S. and Vogel, K. (2010) The social context shaping bioweapons (non)proliferation. Biosecurity and Bioterrorism: Biodefense Strategy, Practice, and Science 8(1): 9-24.

    Bernier, A. and Rose, P. (2014) DIY bioterrorism part II: The proliferation of bioterrorism through synthetic biology, http://www.cbrneportal.com/diy-bioterrorism-part-ii-the-proliferation-of-bioterrorism-throughsynthetic-biology, accessed 14 July 2014.

    Bonneuil, C., Joly, P.B. and Marris, C. (2008) Disentrenching experiment: The construction of GM-crop field trials as a social problem. Science Technology & Human Values 33(2): 201-229.

    BWC (2012) Final Document of the Seventh Review Conference of the States Parties to the Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production and Stockpiling of Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weapons and on Their Destruction. Geneva: United Nations Office at Geneva.

    Campos, L. (2013) Outsiders and in-laws: Drew Endy and the case of synthetic biology. In: O. Harman and M. R. Dietrich (eds.) Outsider Scientists: Routes to Innovation in Biology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago, pp. 331-348.

    Carlson, R. (2003) The pace and proliferation of biological technologies. Biosecurity and Bioterrorism: Biodefense Strategy, Practice, and Science 1(3): 1-12.

  • Metrics
    No metrics available