Indicators For Sustainable Prosperity? Challenges And Potentials For Indicator Use In Political Processes

Book English OPEN
Jones, A ; Mair, S ; Ward, J ; Druckman, A ; Lyon, F ; Christie, I ; Hafner, S (2016)

The use of quantified indicators for the implementation and measurement of social progress is a well-established policy tool. However, any form of ‘social progress’ is inherently contested and a meaningful application of indicators in such contexts poses numerous challenges. In this paper we explore how indicators might be used to research and implement sustainable prosperity. We do this by reviewing key critiques of indicators and their political use (and misuse), drawing out lessons from previous indicator projects such as the UN Sustainable Development Goals, and Taking Part. We argue that because classic indicators rely on simplification and quantification, they struggle to do justice to objectives like sustainable prosperity which come with conflicting understandings and contain unquantifiable subjective elements. Indicators can only be a partial representation of sustainable prosperity, we find, and thus should not be understood as a way to measure it, but a way of articulating a particular set of political priorities. This way indicators can be a useful tool for constructing new understandings, holding powerful actors to account and enabling engagement with policy end goals.
  • References (46)
    46 references, page 1 of 5

    Epstein, J. (2008) 'Why Model?', Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 11(412), pp. 12.

    Espeland, W. and Sauder, M. (2007) 'Rankings and reactivity: How public measures recreate social worlds', American Journal of Sociology, 113(1), pp. 1- 40.

    Eurostat (2015) Sustainable development in the European Union: 2015 monitoring report of the EU Sustainable Development Strategy. Luxembourg Eurostat Statistical Books.

    Finnerty, J. (2005) 'Social Indicators: Pitfalls and Promise', in Herrman, P. (ed.) Utopia Between Corrupted Public Responsibility and Contested Modernisation: Globalization and Social Responsibility, p.61 Nova Science, pp. 61-76.

    Fraser, E., Dougill, A., Mabee, W., Reed, M. and McAlpine, P. (2006) 'Bottom up and top down: analysis of participatory processes for sustainability indicator identification as a pathway to community empowerment and sustainable environmental management', Journal of Environmental Management, 78 (2), pp., 78(2), pp. 114-127.

    Fredericks, S. (2014) 'Measuring and Evaluating Sustainability: ethics in sustainability indexes'.

    Frey, D. and MacNaughton, G. (2016) 'A Human Rights Lens on Full Employment and Decent Work in the 2030 Sustainable Development Agenda', SAGE Open, 6(2), pp. 1-13.

    Hajer, M., Nilsson, M., Raworth, K., Bakker, P., Berkhout, F., de Boer, Y., Rockström, J., Ludwig, K. and Kok, M. (2015) 'Beyond cockpit-ism: Four insights to enhance the transformative potential of the sustainable development goals', Sustainability, 7(2), pp. 1651-1660.

    Hezri, A. and Dovers, S. (2006) 'Sustainability indicators, policy, and governance: Issues for ecological economics', Ecological Economics, 60, pp. 86-99.

    Howard, J. and Wheeler, J. (2015) 'What community development and citizen participation should contribute to the new global framework for sustainable development', Community Development Journal, 50(4), pp. 553-570.

  • Metrics
    views in OpenAIRE
    views in local repository
    downloads in local repository

    The information is available from the following content providers:

    From Number Of Views Number Of Downloads
    White Rose Research Online - IRUS-UK 0 40
Share - Bookmark