To read or not to read? The politics of overlooking gender in the geographical canon

Article English OPEN
Maddrell, A. (2015)

Wherever there is an established ‘canon’ within an established scholarly arena, this is near universally dominated by texts written by men. Whilst\ud historical contextual reasons may account for the gendering of such knowledge production in relation to publications dating from the nineteenth and\ud preceding centuries, one has to ask why this has persisted in an era of equal access to education and academia in the twentieth century. Why is women’s\ud work, highly influential in its day, overlooked in subsequent histories of the discipline and therefore marginalised in discussions of key works? These questions are particularly pertinent to any notion of a geographical canon, given the subject’s relatively late arrival as a degree award in the UK from 1917 onwards. This paper draws on an analysis of the significance of lineage, reviewing, reputation and genre in the contextualised production and reception of selected work to explore the merits and demerits of a geographical canon e and the implications for gendered geographical knowledge. It goes on to suggest i) a more inclusive and dialogic relational approach to understanding past and present geographical work based on Kilcup’s notion of the ‘soft canon’; ii) a broadening of the cast and range of outputs considered ‘influential’; and iii) encourages greater critical reflection on contemporary practices of canonization within sub-disciplines.
  • References (28)
    28 references, page 1 of 3

    Asada, T. 2001. Nonlinear dynamics of debt and capital: a Post-Keynesian analysis. In Y. Aruka (Ed.) Evolutionary Controversies in Economics (Tokyo: Springer-Verlag).

    Barbosa-Filho, N., 2015, Elasticity of substitution and social conflict: a structuralist note on Piketty's Capital in the Twenty-first Century, Cambridge Journal of Economics, Advance Access.

    Barbosa-Filho, N., and Taylor, L. 2006. Distributive and demand cycles in the US economy - a structuralist Goodwin model. Metroeconomica 57, (3): 389-411 Charles, S., 2008. Teaching Minsky's financial instability hypothesis: a manageable suggestion.

    Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 31, 1: 125-38 Chauvet, E., Paullet, J., Previte, J. and Walls, Z. 2002. A Lotka Volterra three-species food chain.

    Mathematics Magazine 75, 4: 253-55 Desai, M. 1984. An econometric model of the share of wages in national income: UK 1855-1965. In R. M. Goodwin (Ed.) Non-linear models of fluctuating growth, (pp. 253-77). Berlin: Springer.

    Desai, M., Henry, P., Mosley, A. and Pemberton, M. 2006. A clarification of the Goodwin model of the growth cycle. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 30, pp. 2661-2670.

    Fazzari, S., Ferri, P. and Greenberg, E., 2008. Cash flow, investment, and Keynes-Minsky cycles.

    Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 65, 3-4, 555-572 Flaschel, P., and Groh, G. 1995. The classical growth cycle: reformulation, simulation and some facts.

    Economic Notes, 24, 293-326.

    Flaschel, P., Groh, G., Kauermann, G., and Teuber T. 2010. The Goodwin Distributive Cycle After Fifteen Years of New Observations, in Flaschel, P. (ed.), Topics in Classical Micro- and Macroeconomics, Springer Berlin Heidelberg Flaschel, P. and Proaño C. 2007. AS-AD Disequilibrium dynamics and the Taylor interest rate policy rule: Euro-Area based estimation and simulation. In: Aspects of Modern Monetary and Macroeconomic Policies. Ed. P. Arestis, E. Hein and E. Le Heron. Houndsmill: Palgrave MacMillan Goldstein, J. P. 1999a. Predator-Prey Model Estimates of the Cyclical Profit Squeeze.

  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark