Therapy for Auditory Processing Impairment in Aphasia: An evaluation of two approaches

Article English OPEN
Woolf, C. ; Panton, A. ; Rosen, S. ; Best, W. ; Marshall, J. (2014)
  • Publisher: Routledge
  • Related identifiers: doi: 10.1080/02687038.2014.931921
  • Subject: P1
    mesheuropmc: behavioral disciplines and activities | psychological phenomena and processes

Purpose: This study evaluated two forms of discrimination therapy for auditory processing impairment in aphasia. It aimed to determine whether therapy can improve speech perception and/or help participants use semantic information to compensate for their impairment. Changes in listening were also explored by recording the level of facilitation needed during therapy tasks. Finally the study examined the effect of therapy on an everyday listening activity: a telephone message task. \ud \ud Method: The study employed a repeated measures design. Eight participants received 12 sessions each of phonological and semantic-phonological therapy. Both programmes used minimal pair judgement tasks, but the latter embedded such tasks within a meaningful context, so encouraged the strategic use of semantic information (semantic bootstrapping). Experimental measures of auditory discrimination and comprehension were administered twice before therapy, once after each programme, and again six weeks later. The telephone message task was also administered at each time point. Test data were subjected to both group and individual analyses. Records of progress during therapy (i.e changes in support needed to carry out therapy tasks) were completed during treatment and analysed across the group. \ud \ud Results: Group analyses showed no significant changes in tests of word and nonword discrimination as a result of therapy. One comprehension task improved following therapy, but two did not. There was also no indication that therapy improved the discrimination of treated words, as assessed by a priming task. The facilitation scores indicated that participants needed less support during tasks as therapy progressed, possibly as a result of improved listening. There was a significant effect of time on the telephone message task. Across all tasks there were few individual gains. \ud \ud Conclusions: The results offer little evidence that therapy improved participants’ discrimination or semantic bootstrapping skills. Some changes in listening may have occurred, as indicated by the facilitation scores. Reasons for the null findings are discussed.
  • References (29)
    29 references, page 1 of 3

    Archibald, L., Orange, J., & Jamieson, D. (2009) Implementation of computer-based language therapy in aphasia. Therapy Archives of Neurological Disorders, 2 (5), 299-311.

    Basso, A., Casati, G., & Vignolo, L. A. (1977). Phonemic identification defect in aphasia. Cortex, 13, 1, 85-95.

    Best, W., & Howard, D. (1994). Word sound deafness resolved? Aphasiology, 8(3), 223-256

    Bhogal, S., Teasell, R. & Speechley, M. (2003). Intensity of Aphasia Therapy, Impact on Recovery. Stroke. 34, 987-993.

    Blumstein, S. (1991). Phonological Aspects of Aphasia in M. Sarno (ed) Acquired Aphasia. 2nd Edition. San Diego: Academic Press, pp. 151-180.

    Blumstein, S. E. (1994). Impairments of speech production and speech perception in aphasia. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B, Biological Sciences, 346, 1315, 29-36.

    Davidson, B., Howe, T., Worrall, L., Hickson, L., & Togher, L. (2008). Social participation for older people with aphasia: The impact of communication disability on friendships. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 15 (4), 325-340.

    Fillingham, J.K., Sage, K., & Lambon Ralph, M.A. (2005). Treatment of anomia using errorless versus errorful learning: are frontal executive skills and feedback important? International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders. 40 (4), 505-523.

    Fillingham, J.K., Sage, K., & Lambon Ralph, M.A. (2005). Further explorations and an overview of errorless and errorful therapy for aphasic word-finding difficulties: the number of naming attempts during therapy affects outcome. Aphasiology, 19 (7), 597-614.

    Francis, D. R., Riddoch, M. J. & Humphreys, G. W.(2001). Cognitive rehabilitation of word meaning deafness. Aphasiology, 15, 749-766.

  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark