Can we (control) Engineer the degree learning process?

Article English OPEN
White, A. S. ; Censlive, M. ; Nielsen, D. (2014)

This paper investigates how control theory could be applied to learning processes in engineering education. The initial point for the analysis is White’s Double Loop learning model of human automation control modified for the education process where a set of governing principals is chosen, probably by the course designer. After initial training the student decides unknowingly on a mental map or model. After observing how the real world is behaving, a strategy to achieve the governing variables is chosen and a set of actions chosen. This may not be a conscious operation, it maybe completely instinctive. These actions will cause some consequences but not until a certain time delay. The current model is compared with the work of Hollenbeck on goal setting, Nelson’s model of self-regulation and that of Abdulwahed, Nagy and Blanchard at Loughborough who investigated control methods applied\ud to the learning process.
  • References (18)
    18 references, page 1 of 2

    [1] Skinner, B.F. (1958) Teaching Machines, Science, Vol 128, No3330, 969-977.

    [2] Houghton, W, (2004) Learning and Teaching Theory for Engineering Academics, Higher Education Academy, Engineering subject centre.

    [3] Kolb, D (1984) Experiential Learning: experience as source of learning and development, Prentice-Hall.

    [4] Engineering Council (1985) Standards and Routes to Registration (SARTOR). EC 10 Maltravers Street, London WC2R 3ER, England.

    [5] Craik, K, (1943) Nature of Explanation, CUP

    [6] Norman, D. A. (1983). Some observations on mental models. In D. Gentner and A. L. Stevens (Eds.), Mental models (p. 7-14). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    [7] Erez, M. (1977). Feedback: A Necessary Condition for the Goal Setting Performance Relationship. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol.62, pp.624-627.

    [8] Campion, M. A., & Lord, R. G. (1982). A control systems conceptualization of the goal-setting and changing process. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, Vol.30, pp.265-287.

    [9] Klein, H. J. (1989). An integrated control theory model of work motivation. Academy of Management, Vol.14, pp.150-172.

    [10] Hollenbeck, J. (1989). Control Theory and the Perception of Work Environments: The Effects of Focus and Attention on Affective and Behavioral Reactions at Work. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol.43, pp.406-430

  • Metrics
    views in OpenAIRE
    views in local repository
    downloads in local repository

    The information is available from the following content providers:

    From Number Of Views Number Of Downloads
    Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - IRUS-UK 0 10
Share - Bookmark