Individualised claims of conscience, clinical judgement and best interests

Article English OPEN
Smith, Stephen (2018)

Conscience and conscientious objections are important issues in medical law and ethics. However, discussions tend to focus on a particular type of conscience-based claim. These types of claims are based upon predictable, generalizable rules in which an individual practitioner objects to what is otherwise standard medical treatment (for example, the objections recognised in the Abortion Act). However, not all conscience based claims are of this type. There are other claims which are based not on an objection to a treatment in general but in individual cases. In other words, these cases may involve practices which the doctor does not usually object to but does so in this instance on these facts. This paper will explore these types of conscience-based claims in two ways. First, it will explore whether these types of individualised conscience-based claims are really conscience claims at all. Second, it will explore how these claims interact with the other sorts of judgements we expect doctors to make in these cases (things like professional standards, clinical judgment and the best interests of the patient).
  • References (17)
    17 references, page 1 of 2

    [10] Glover, J (2015) On Moral Nose. In J. Coggon, S. Chan, S. Holm, T. Kushner, From Reason to Practice in Bioethics: An Anthology Dedicated to the Works of John Harris. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    [11] Holm, S. and Edgar, A., (2008), Best Interests: A Philosophical Critique, Health Care Analysis, 16, 197-207.

    [12] Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990, section 38.

    [13] Kennedy, I., (1981), The Unmasking of Medicine, London: George Allen and Unwin.

    [14] Kennedy, I., (1988), What is a Medical Decision?. In I. Kennedy, Treat Me Right: Essays in Medical Law and Ethics (pp. 19-31). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    [15] Magnusson, R., (2002), Angels of Death: Exploring the Euthanasia Underground, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    [16] McLeod, C., (2012) Taking a Feminist Relational Perspective on Conscience. In J. Downie and J. Llewellyn (Eds.) Being Relational: Reflections on Relational Theory and Health Law (pp. 161-181). Vancouver: U of British Columbia Press.

    [17] Mental Capacity Act 2005.

    [18] Mental Capacity Code of Practice 2007. Available at (accessed 14 July 2016)

    [19] Miola, J., (2015), Making Decisions about Decision-Making: Conscience, Regulation and the Law, Medical Law Review, 23(2), 263-282.

  • Metrics
    views in OpenAIRE
    views in local repository
    downloads in local repository

    The information is available from the following content providers:

    From Number Of Views Number Of Downloads
    Online Research @ Cardiff - IRUS-UK 0 57
Share - Bookmark