The impact of legal aid cuts on access to justice in the UK

Part of book or chapter of book English OPEN
Shah, Smita (2015)
  • Publisher: Institute of Commonwealth Studies, School of Advanced Study, University of London
  • Related identifiers: doi: 10.14296/SAS.ICwS.001.14
  • Subject: HRDS

Lawyers would argue that this is an epochal moment for access to justice in the UK. Time will judge in due course; for now it worth simply setting a marker down to capture what has passed. The date to note is 1 April 2013: this was when the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (LASPO), an Act of Parliament of the United Kingdom, came into affect. LASPO changed the landscape of civil legal aid in England and Wales not only in how and by whom legal aid was administered; LASPO profoundly altered what remained within scope for legal aid, taking private family law disputes such as divorce and child custody, immigration, housing, debt and social welfare and employment out of the provision of legal aid save for those cases where ‘domestic violence is involved, life or liberty are at stake or people risk losing their home’ (BBC 2013). The cuts were introduced with the aim to shave off £350 million from the £2 billion civil and criminal legal aid budget, primarily in civil legal aid with proposals for eventual cuts in criminal legal aid. For a nation in financially difficult times following the banking crisis of 2008 and subsequent recession, the retrenchment of the public services was bitter surgery the nation would have to endure. Why would the provision of legal aid be immune from excision?
  • References (9)

    BBC (2013) Q&A: Legal aid changes (20 March 2013), available at http:// (accessed 8 Oct. 2015).

    Byrom, N. (2013) The State of the Sector: The impact of cuts and civil legal aid on practitioners and her clients, A Report by the Centre for Human Rights in Practice, University of Warwick in association with illegal, available at legalaidcuts/153064_statesector_report-final.pdf (accessed 8 Oct. 2015).

    Family Law Week (n.d.) Ministry of justice proposes closure of 157 courts, available at (accessed 8 Oct. 2015); BBC (16 July 2015), Ninety one 'surplus' courts face closure, available at (accessed 8 Oct. 2015).

    Genn, H. (2012) 'Why privatisation of civil justice is a rule of law issue' F. A. Mann lecture, available at uploads/2014/08/36th-F-A-Mann-Lecture-19.11.12-Professor-HazelGenn.pdf (accessed 8 Oct. 2015).

    Hyde, J. (2015) 'HMCTS reveals plans to cut 400 court jobs', The Law Society Gazette (22 June 2015), available at http://www.lawgazette. (accessed 8 Oct. 2015).

    Hyde, J. (2012) 'Hundreds of court posts axed', The Law Society Gazette (19 Jan. 2012), available at (accessed 8 Oct. 2015).

    Pyner, C. (2012) 'Prison privatisation should be a national scandal', The Guardian (8 Nov.2012), available at commentisfree/2012/nov/08/prison-privatisation-g4s-wolds (accessed 8 Oct. 2015).

    Travis, A. (2014) 'Chris Grayling to press ahead with probation service privatisation', The Guardian (2 Dec. 2014), available at http://www. (accessed 8 Oct. 2015).

    UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC) (2015) Report of the Special Rapporteur on violence against women, its causes and consequences, Rashida Manjoo Mission to the United Kingdom and Northern Ireland, UN Doc. A/ HRC/29/27/Add.2 (19 May 2015).

  • Metrics
    views in OpenAIRE
    views in local repository
    downloads in local repository

    The information is available from the following content providers:

    From Number Of Views Number Of Downloads
    SAS-SPACE - IRUS-UK 0 112
Share - Bookmark