Neurofeedback of Theta and Beta Frequencies: Effects on Selective Attention and Response Inhibition

Doctoral thesis English OPEN
Pimenta, Miguel Garcia
  • Publisher: Goldsmiths, University of London

Despite the widespread employment of electroencephalographic (EEG) neurofeedback (NF) in clinical and cognitive enhancement contexts, its impact on selective attention and response inhibition remains poorly understood. The present research investigated the influence of theta frequency suppression and low-beta frequencies enhancement on these cognitive functions. A first study investigated the differential impact of the sensorimotor rhythm (SMR) and beta1 amplitude enhancement NF on event-related potentials (ERP) and behavioral measures indexing selective attention and response inhibition in the three-stimuli oddball and in the cued-Go/Nogo tasks. The learning curves evinced training-specific amplitude increments in the beta1 but not in the SMR frequency. However, SMR NF was associated with increased Go-P3 amplitude, decreased mean RT and RT SD, while control and beta1 NF were associated with increased false alarm rates in the cued-Go/Nogo. A second study attempted to understand whether performance increments in selective attention and response inhibition could be explained by theta suppression NF when compared to beta1 NF in the same task conditions. Within-session theta amplitude was decreased in theta relative to beta1 NF in passive resting state but not during feedback trials. However, for both theta and beta1 NF there was no evidence of training-specific amplitude changes relative to controls. Regarding selective attention, the mean RT was increased following beta1 NF and decreased after theta NF but not in the same task conditions. This study also failed to provide evidence of increased or decreased performance in response inhibition. In conclusion, the present research was not conclusive regarding the NF conditions that might have contributed to improvements in target processing efficiency and cancellation of a previously prepared response in previous studies. Specific proposals to address several methodological limitations that might have hindered the possibility of detecting frequency-specific amplitude changes and cognitive improvements were advanced.
  • References (180)
    180 references, page 1 of 18

    Colgin, L. L. (2013). Mechanisms and Functions of Theta Rhythms. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 295-314.

    Comerchero, M. D., & Polich, J. (1999). P3a and P3b from typical auditory and visual stimuli. Clinical Neurophysiology, 110(1), 24-30.

    Corbetta, M., & Shulman, G. L. (2002). Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, 3(3), 201-215.

    Courchesne, E., Hillyard, S. A., & Galambos, R. (1975). Stimulus novelty, task relevance and the visual evoked potential in man. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 39(2), 131-143.

    Courchesne, E., Kilman, B. A., Galambos, R., & Lincoln, A. J. (1984). Autism: Processing of novel auditory information assessed by event-related brain potentials. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 59(3), 238-248.

    De Blasio, F. M., & Barry, R. J. (2013a). Prestimulus alpha and beta determinants of ERP responses in the Go/NoGo task. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 89(1), 9- 17.

    De Blasio, F. M., & Barry, R. J. (2013b). Prestimulus delta and theta determinants of ERP responses in the Go/NoGo task. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 87(3), 279-288.

    De Gennaro, L., Ferrara, M., & Bertini, M. (2001). The boundary between wakefulness and sleep: quantitative electroencephalographic changes during the sleep onset period. Neuroscience, 107(1), 1-11.

    de Zambotti, M., Bianchin, M., Magazzini, L., Gnesato, G., & Angrilli, A. (2012). The efficacy of EEG neurofeedback aimed at enhancing sensory-motor rhythm theta ratio in healthy subjects. Experimental Brain Research. 221(1), 69-74.

    Debener, S., Kranczioch, C., Herrmann, C. S., & Engel, A. K. (2002). Auditory novelty oddball allows reliable distinction of top-down and bottom-up processes of attention. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 46(1), 77-84.

  • Metrics
    views in OpenAIRE
    views in local repository
    downloads in local repository

    The information is available from the following content providers:

    From Number Of Views Number Of Downloads
    Goldsmiths Research Online - IRUS-UK 0 101
Share - Bookmark