Prospect theory and the effects of bankruptcy laws on entrepreneurial aspirations

Article English OPEN
Estrin, Saul ; Mickiewicz, Tomasz ; Rebmann, Anna (2017)

We apply prospect theory to explain how personal and corporate bankruptcy laws affect risk perceptions of entrepreneurs at time of entry and therefore their growth ambitions. Previous theories have reached ambiguous conclusions as to whether countries with more debtor-friendly bankruptcy laws (i.e. laws that are more forgiving towards debtors in bankruptcy proceedings) are likely to have more entrepreneurs, or whether, creditorfriendly regimes have positive effects on new ventures via enhanced incentives for the supply of credit to entrepreneurs. Responding to this ambiguity, we apply prospect theory to propose that entrepreneurs do not attach the same significance to different elements of bankruptcy codes—and to explain which aspects of debtor-friendly bankruptcy laws matter more to entrepreneurs. Based on this, we derive and confirm hypotheses about the impact of aspects of bankruptcy codes on entrepreneurial activity using the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor combined with data on both personal and corporate bankruptcyregulations for 15 developed OECD countries. We use multilevel random coefficient logistic regressions to take account of the hierarchical nature of the data (country and individual levels). Because entrepreneurs and creditors are sensitive to different elements of the codes, there is scope for optimisation of the legal design of bankruptcy law to achieve both an adequate supply of credit and to encourage high-ambition entrepreneurship.
  • References (85)
    85 references, page 1 of 9

    Aidis, R., Estrin, E., & Mickiewicz, T. (2012). Size matters: entrepreneurial entry and government. Small Business Economics, 39(1), 119-139.

    Armour, J. (2001). The law & economics of corporate insolvency: a review. In ESRC Centre for business research working paper 62. Cambridge: University of Cambridge.

    Armour, J., & Cumming, D. (2008). Bankruptcy law and entrepreneurship. American Law and Economics Review, 10(2), 303-350.

    Arrow, K. (1971). Essays in the theory of risk bearing. Chicago: Markham.

    Audretsch, D. (1991). New-firm survival and the technological regime. The Review of Economics and Statistics., 73(3), 441-450.

    Barberis, N., & Thaler, R. (2003). Survey of behavioral finance, handbook of the economics of finance. New York: Elsevier.

    Baumol, W. (1990). Entrepreneurship: productive, unproductive and destructive. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), 893-921.

    Berkowitz, J., & White, M. J. (2004). Bankruptcy and small firms' access to credit. RAND Journal of Economics, 35(Spring), 69-84.

    Bliese, P. D. (2002). Multilevel random coefficient modelling in organizational research. In F. Drasgow & N. Schmitt (Eds.), Measuring and analyzing behavior in organizations: advances in measurement and data analysis. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Bosma, N., & Levie, J. (2009). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2009 executive report: Global Entrepreneurship Research Association.

  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark