The use of control charts by lay-people and hospital decision-makers for guiding decision making

Article English OPEN
Schmidtke, Kelly ; Watson, Derrick G. ; Vlaev, Ivo (2016)

Graphs presenting healthcare data are increasingly available to support lay-people and hospital staffs’ decision-making. When making these decisions, hospital staff should consider the role of chance, i.e., random variation. Given random variation, decision-makers must distinguish signals (sometimes called special-cause data) from noise (common-cause data). Unfortunately, many graphs do not facilitate the statistical reasoning necessary to make such distinctions. Control charts are a less commonly used type of graph that support statistical thinking by including reference lines that separate data more likely to be signals from those more likely to be noise. The current work demonstrates for whom (lay-people and hospital staff) and when (treatment and investigative decisions) control charts strengthen data driven decision-making. We present two experiments that compare people’s use of control and non-control charts to make decisions between hospitals (Funnel charts vs League tables) and to monitor changes across time (Run charts with control lines vs Run charts without control lines). As expected, participants more accurately identified the outlying data using a control chart than a non-control chart, but their ability to then apply that information to more complicated questions (e.g., where should I go for treatment?, and should I investigate?) was limited. The discussion highlights some common concerns about using control charts in hospital settings.
  • References (37)
    37 references, page 1 of 4

    Alemi, F., & Neuhauser, D. (2004). Time-between control charts for monitoring asthma attacks. Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement and Patient Safety, 30, 95- 102.

    Amin, S. G. (2001). Control charts 101: A guide to health care applications. Quality Management in Health Care, 9(3), 1-27.

    Balestracci, D. (2011). Four control chart myths from foolish experts: Don't teach people statistics-teach them to solve problems. Quality Digest, Retrieved March 23, 2015, from:

    Boyce, T., Dixon, A., Fasolo, B., et al. (2010). Choosing a high quality hospital: the role of nudges, scorecard design and information. The Kings Fund: London.

    Carey, R. G., & Teeters, J. L. (1995). CQI case-study-reducing medication errors. Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement, 21, 232-237.

    Chance, B. L. (2002). Components of Statistical Thinking and Implications for Instruction and Assessment, Journal of Statistics Education [Online], 10(3)

    Curran, E. T., Benneyan, J. C., & Hood, J. (2002). Controlling Methicillin‐Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus: A feedback approach using annotated statistical process control charts. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, 23, 13-18.

    Curran, E., Harper, P., Loveday, H., Gilmour, H., Jones, S., Benneyan, J., Hood, J., & Pratt, R. (2008). Results of a multicentre randomised controlled trial of statistical process control charts and structured diagnostic tools to reduce ward-acquired meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: the CHART Project. Journal of Hospital Infection, 70(2), 127-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2008.06.013

    de Leval, M.R., Francois, K., Bull, C., Brawn, W. & Spiegelhalter, D. (1994). Analysis of a cluster of surgical failures: application to a series of neonatal arterial switch operations. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 107, 914-924.

    Deming, W. E. (1975). On probability as a basis for action, The American Statistician, 29(4), 146-152. doi: 10.1080/00031305.1975.10477402

  • Metrics
    views in OpenAIRE
    views in local repository
    downloads in local repository

    The information is available from the following content providers:

    From Number Of Views Number Of Downloads
    Warwick Research Archives Portal Repository - IRUS-UK 0 50
Share - Bookmark