Give it up for climate change : a defence of the beneficiary pays principle

Article English OPEN
Page, Edward (2012)

This article focuses on the normative problem of establishing how the burdens associated with implementing policies designed to prevent, or manage, climate change should be shared amongst states involved in ongoing international climate change negotiations. This problem has three key features: identifying the nature and extent of the burdens that need to be borne; identifying the type of agent that should be allocated these burdens; and distributing amongst the particular ‘tokens’ of the relevant ‘agent type’ climatic burdens according to principles that none could reasonably reject. The article defends a key role in climatic burden-sharing policy for the principle that states benefiting most from activities that cause climate change should bear the greatest burden in terms of the costs of preventing dangerous climate change. I outline two versions of this ‘beneficiary pays’ principle; examine the strengths and weakness of each version; and explore how the most plausible version (which I call the ‘unjust enrichment’ account) could be operationalized in the context of global climate governance.
  • References (44)
    44 references, page 1 of 5

    Adger, W.N. (2010), 'Climate Change, Human Well-being and Insecurity', New Political Economy 15(2): 275-92.

    Allen, M.R. and Lord, R. (2004), 'The Blame Game: Who will pay for the damaging consequences of climate change', Nature 432, 2 December: 551-2.

    Anwander, N. (2005), 'Contributing and Benefiting: Two Grounds for Duties to the Victims of Injustice', Ethics & International Affairs 19(1): 39-45.

    Baer, P., G. Fieldman, T. Athanasiou and S. Kartha (2008), 'Greenhouse Development Rights: towards an equitable framework for global climate policy', Cambridge Review of International Affairs 21(4): 649- 69.

    Birks, P. (2001), 'Unjust Enrichment and Wrongful Enrichment', Texas Law Review 79: 1767-94.

    Boden, T.A., G. Marland and R.J. Andres (2011), Global, Regional, and National Fossil-Fuel CO2 Emissions, Oak Ridge, TN: Oak Ridge National Laboratory, doi 10.3334/CDIAC/00001_V2011 Butt, D. (2007), 'On benefiting from injustice', Canadian Journal of Philosophy 37(1): 129-52.

    Butt, D. (2009), Rectifying International Injustice: Principles of Compensation and Restitution Between Nations, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Caney, S. (2005), 'Cosmopolitan Justice, Responsibility, and Global Climate Change', Leiden Journal of International Law 18(4), 747-75.

    Caney, S. (2006) 'Environmental Degradation, Reparations, and the Moral Significance of History', Journal of Social Philosophy 37(3): 464-82.

    Caney, S. (2010) 'Climate Change and the Duties of the Advantaged', Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 13(1): 203-28.

  • Related Research Results (2)
  • Metrics
    views in OpenAIRE
    views in local repository
    downloads in local repository

    The information is available from the following content providers:

    From Number Of Views Number Of Downloads
    Warwick Research Archives Portal Repository - IRUS-UK 0 662
Share - Bookmark