Is empirical imagination a constraint on adaptationist theory construction? (Commentary)

Article English OPEN
Dickins, Thomas E. ; Dickins, David W. (2002)

Andrews et al. present a form of instrumental adaptationism that is designed to test the hypothesis that a given trait is an adaptation. This epistemological commitment aims to make clear statements about behavioural natural kinds. The instrumental logic is sound, but it is the limits of our empirical imagination that can cause problems for theory construction.
  • References (1)

    Dickins, T.E., & Dickins, D.W. (2001) Symbols, Stimulus Equivalence and the Origins of Language. Behaviour and Philosophy, 29: 221-244 Horne, P.J., & Lowe, F.C. (1996) On the origins of naming and other symbolic behaviour. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behaviour, 65 (1): 185-241 Sidman, M., Rauzin, R., Lazar, R., Cunningham, S., Tailby, W., & Carrigan, P. (1982) A search for symmetry in the conditional discriminations of rhesus monkeys, baboons and children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behaviour, 43: 21-42 Tonneau, F. (2001) Equivalence Relations: A Critical Analysis. European Journal of Behaviour Analysis, 2: 1-33

  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark