An assessment of the torrefaction of North American pine and life cycle greenhouse gas emissions

Article English OPEN
McNamee, P. ; Adams, P.W.R. ; McManus, M.C. ; Dooley, B. ; Darvell, L.I. ; Williams, A. ; Jones, J.M. (2016)
  • Publisher: Elsevier BV
  • Journal: Energy Conversion and Management, volume 113, pages 177-188 (issn: 0196-8904)
  • Related identifiers: doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2016.01.006
  • Subject: Wood pellets | Pine | Energy Engineering and Power Technology | Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment | GHG | Bioenergy | Torrefaction | Nuclear Energy and Engineering | LCA | Fuel Technology

<p>Bioenergy is increasingly being used to meet EU objectives for renewable energy generation and reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Problems with using biomass however include high moisture contents, lower calorific value and poor grindability when compared to fossil fuels. Torrefaction is a pre-treatment process that aims to address these issues. In this paper four torrefaction treatments of pine were performed and a mass-energy balance calculated. Using experimental data, a pellet production supply chain incorporating torrefaction was modelled and compared to an existing wood pellet system to determine life-cycle GHG emissions. Two utility fuels, wood chips and natural gas, were considered to provide process heat in addition to volatile gases released during torrefaction (torgas). Experimental results show that torrefaction reduces the moisture content and increases the calorific value of the fuels. Increasing torrefaction temperature and residence time results in lower mass and energy yields. GHG emissions reduce with increasing torrefaction severity. Emissions from drying &amp; torrefaction and shipping are the highest GHG contributors to the supply chain. All 4 torrefaction conditions assessed outperformed traditional wood pellet supply chain emissions but more land is required which increases with temperature and residence time. Sensitivity analysis results show that emissions increase significantly where natural gas is used for utility fuel and no torgas is utilised.</p>
  • References (71)
    71 references, page 1 of 8

    [1] European Commission. Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing directives 2001/ 77/EC and 2003/30/EC; 2009.

    [2] European Commission. A policy framework for climate and energy in the period from 2020 to 2030. CM (2014) 15 final. Brussels; 2014.

    [3] Lockwood M. The political sustainability of climate policy: the case of the UK Climate Change Act. Glob Environ Change 2013;23(5):1339-48.

    [4] DECC. UK bioenergy strategy; 2012.

    [5] DECC. 2014 UK greenhouse gas emissions, provisional figures. London; 2015.

    [6] Lamers P et al. Developments in international solid biofuel trade - an analysis of volumes, policies, and market factors. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2012;16 (5):3176-99.

    [7] Ofgem. Renewables obligation: sustainability criteria guidance. Office for Gas and Electricity Markets; 2014.

    [8] Ofgem. Biomass sustainability report 2013-14 dataset annual profiling information. London: Office of Gas and Electricity Markets; 2015.

    [9] Uslu A, Faaij APC, Bergman PCA. Pre-treatment technologies, and their effect on international bioenergy supply chain logistics. Techno-economic evaluation of torrefaction, fast pyrolysis and pelletisation. Energy 2008;33(8):1206-23.

    [10] Adams PWR, Shirley J, Whittaker C, Shield I, Darvell LI, Jones JM, McManus MC. Integrated assessment of the potential for torrefied wood pellets in the UK electricity market. In: World bioenergy 2014 conference, Jönköping, Sweden; 2014.

  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark