Design and methods in a survey of living conditions in the Arctic–the SLiCA study

Article English OPEN
Eliassen, Bent-Martin ; Melhus, Marita ; Kruse, Jack ; Poppel, Birger ; Broderstad, Ann Ragnhild (2012)
  • Publisher: University of Oulu
  • Journal: International Journal of Circumpolar Health, volume 71 (issn: 1797-237X, eissn: 1239-9736)
  • Related identifiers: pmc: PMC3417679, doi: 10.3402/IJCH.v71i0.17229
  • Subject: Inuit | living conditions | VDP::Medisinske Fag: 700::Helsefag: 800::Epidemiologi medisinsk og odontologisk statistikk: 803 | Original Research Article | survey | Iñupiat | Inuit; Iñupiat; Sami; Indigenous peoples; living conditions; survey | Indigenous peoples | VDP::Social science: 200 | Sami | VDP::Samfunnsvitenskap: 200 | VDP::Medical disciplines: 700::Health sciences: 800::Epidemiology medical and dental statistics: 803

Objectives: The main objective of this study is to describe the methods and design of the survey of living conditions in the Arctic (SLiCA), relevant participation rates and the distribution of participants, as applicable to the survey data in Alaska, Greenland and Norway. This article briefly addresses possible selection bias in the data and also the ways to tackle it in future studies. Study design: Population-based cross-sectional survey. Methods: Indigenous individuals aged 16 years and older, living in Greenland, Alaska and in traditional settlement areas in Norway, were invited to participate. Random sampling methods were applied in Alaska and Greenland, while non-probability sampling methods were applied in Norway. Data were collected in 3 periods: in Alaska, from January 2002 to February 2003; in Greenland, from December 2003 to August 2006; and in Norway, in 2003 and from June 2006 to June 2008. The principal method in SLiCA was standardised face-to-face interviews using a questionnaire. Results: A total of 663, 1,197 and 445 individuals were interviewed in Alaska, Greenland and Norway, respectively. Very high overall participation rates of 83% were obtained in Greenland and Alaska, while a more conventional rate of 57% was achieved in Norway. A predominance of female respondents was obtained in Alaska. Overall, the Sami cohort is older than the cohorts from Greenland and Alaska. Conclusions: Preliminary assessments suggest that selection bias in the Sami sample is plausible but not a major threat. Few or no threats to validity are detected in the data from Alaska and Greenland. Despite different sampling and recruitment methods, and sociocultural differences, a unique database has been generated, which shall be used to explore relationships between health and other living conditions variables.Keywords: Inuit; Iñupiat; Sami; Indigenous peoples; living conditions; survey(Published: 19 March 2012)Citation: Int J Circumpolar Health 2012, 71: 17229 - DOI: 10.3402/IJCH.v71i0.17229
  • References (34)
    34 references, page 1 of 4

    1. Andersen T, Kruse J, Poppel B. Survey of living conditions in the Arctic: Inuit, Saami and the indigenous peoples of Chukotka (SLICA). Arctic. 2002;55:310 5.

    2. Kruse J, Poppel B, Abryutina L, Duhaime G, Martin S, Poppel M, et al. Survey of Living Conditions in the Arctic (SLiCA). Social Indic Res. 2009;33:107 34.

    3. Poppel B. Some data sources on people, peoples, communities, regions and human activities in Greenland. In: Winther G, editor. The political economy of northern regional development. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers; 2010. p. 287 320.

    4. Kruse J, Poppel B. Survey of living conditions in the Arctic. [cited 2011 Dec 16]. Available from: http://www.

    5. Bowling A. Research methods in health: investigating health and health services. 3rd edition. Buckingham: Open University Press; 2009. XIII, 525 p.

    6. USCB. Demographic profiles. Washington, DC: U.S. Cenus Bureau; 2000 [cited 2011 Apr 17]. Available from: http://

    7. Berner J. Alaska. In: Young TK, Bjerregaard P, editors. Health transitions in Arctic populations. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press; 2008. p. 53 70.

    8. Krauss M. Native languages of Alaska. In: Sakiyama O, Miyaoka O, Krauss M, editors. The vanishing languages of the pacific rim. Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press; 2007. p. 406 17.

    9. Alaska Native Language Center. In˜upiaq. Fairbanks: Alaska Native Language Center (ANLC), University of Alaska Fairbanks; 2007 [cited 2010 Dec 14]. Available from: http://

    10. Dahl-Petersen I, Bjerregaard P. Om undersøgelsen. In: Bjerregaard P, Dahl-Petersen I, editors. Befolkningsundersøgelsen i Grønland 2005 2007: levevilka˚r, livsstil og helbred. Copenhagen: Statens Institut for Folkesundhed; 2008. p. 7 15. [in Danish]

  • Similar Research Results (1)
  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark