A comparison of simulation results from two terrestrial carbon cycle models using three climate data sets

Article English OPEN
Ito, Akihiko ; Sasai, Takahiro (2011)

This study addressed how different climate data sets influence simulations of the global terrestrial carbon cycle. For the period 1982–2001, we compared the results of simulations based on three climate data sets (NCEP/NCAR, NCEP/DOE AMIP-II and ERA40) employed in meteorological, ecological and biogeochemical studies and two different models (BEAMS and Sim-CYCLE). The models differed in their parameterizations of photosynthetic and phenological processes but used the same surface climate (e.g. shortwave radiation, temperature and precipitation), vegetation, soil and topography data. The three data sets give different climatic conditions, especially for shortwave radiation, in terms of long-term means, linear trends and interannual variability. Consequently, the simulation results for global net primary productivity varied by 16%–43% only from differences in the climate data sets, especially in these regions where the shortwave radiation data differed markedly: differences in the climate data set can strongly influence simulation results. The differences among the climate data set and between the two models resulted in slightly different spatial distribution and interannual variability in the net ecosystem carbon budget. To minimize uncertainty, we should pay attention to the specific climate data used. We recommend developing an accurate standard climate data set for simulation studies.DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0889.2006.00208.x
  • References (46)
    46 references, page 1 of 5

    Ball, J. T., Woodrow, I. E. and Berry, J. A. 1987. A model predicting stomatal conductance and its contribution to the control of photosynthesis under different environmental conditions. In: Progress in Photosynthesis Research (ed. J. Biggens). Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht, 221-224.

    Bengtsson, L., Hodges, K. I. and Hagemann, S. 2004. Sensitivity of the ERA40 reanalysis to the observing system: determination of the global atmospheric circulation from reduced observations. Tellus 56A, 456-471.

    Betts, A. K., Viterbo, P., Beljaars, A., Pan, H.-L., Hong, S.-Y. and coauthors. 1998. Evaluation of land-surface interaction in ECMWF and NCEP/NCAR reanalysis models over grassland (FIFE) and boreal forest (BOREAS). J. Geophys. Res. 103, 23 079-23 085.

    Cao, M., Prince, S. D., Small, J. and Goetz, S. J. 2004. Remotely sensed interannual variations and trends in terrestrial net primary productivity 1981-2000. Ecosystems 7, 233-242.

    Cramer, W., Kicklighter, D. W., Bondeau, A., Moore, B. I., Churkina, G., and co-authors. and the participants of the Potsdam NPP Model Intercomparison. 1999. Comparing global NPP models of terrestrial net primary productivity (NPP): overview and key results. Global Change Biol. 5(suppl.1), 1-15.

    DeFries, R. S. and Townshend, J. R. G. 1994. NDVI-derived land cover classifications at a global scale. Int. J. Rem. Sens. 15, 3567-3586.

    Dirmeyer, P. A., Guo, Z. and Gao, X. 2004. Comparison, validation, and transferability of eight multiyear global soil wetness products. J. Hydrometeorol. 5, 1011-1033.

    Field, C. B., Randerson, J. T. and Malmstrom, C. M. 1995. Global net primary production: combining ecology and remote sensing. Rem. Sens. Environ. 51, 74-88.

    Fujita, D., Ishizawa, M., Maksyutov, S., Thornton, P. E., Saeki, T. and co-authors. 2003. Inter-annual variability of the atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations as simulated with global terrestrial biosphere models and an atmospheric transport model. Tellus 55B, 530-546.

    Gu, L., Baldocchi, D., Verma, S. B., Black, T. A., Vesala, T. and co-authors. 2002. Advantages of diffuse radiation for terrestrial ecosystem productivity. J. Geophys. Res. 107, 4050, doi: 10.1029/2001JD001242.

  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark