One Health research and training in Australia and New Zealand

Article English OPEN
Reid, Simon A. ; McKenzie, Joanna ; Woldeyohannes, Solomon M. (2016)
  • Publisher: Co-Action Publishing
  • Journal: Infection Ecology & Epidemiology, volume 6 (issn: 2000-8686, eissn: 2000-8686)
  • Related identifiers: doi: 10.3402/iee.v6.33799, doi: 10.3402/iee.v%v.33799, pmc: PMC5131460
  • Subject: funding | Review Article | One Health | zoonoses | Global Reviews of One Health Research and Training | Australia | training | research | New Zealand | Ecohealth | RC109-216 | One Health, Australia, New Zealand, training, research, funding, zoonoses, ecohealth | Infectious and parasitic diseases
    mesheuropmc: education

Purpose of the review: This review was performed to create a repository of information on One Health research and training in Australia and New Zealand (ANZ). The review sought to determine 1) how many training activities there are in ANZ, 2) how much research on zoonotic diseases is undertaken by multidisciplinary teams, and 3) how collaborative and integrated they are.Recent findings: There are few opportunities for training in One Health in ANZ. The majority require enrolment in a postgraduate degree programme, and there is only one postgraduate level course that is also available for continuing professional development (CPD). Of the broad range of One Health research performed in ANZ, the majority is performed by teams with limited disciplinary diversity, although diversity is improving.Summary: Progress has been made in building collaboration between human, animal, and environmental health professions. However, the lack of clearly defined competencies and agreed purpose for One Health may be impeding collaboration.Keywords: One Health; Australia; New Zealand; training; research; funding; zoonoses; Ecohealth(Published: 29 November 2016)Citation: Infection Ecology and Epidemiology 2016, 6: 33799 -
  • References (51)
    51 references, page 1 of 6

    1. Woolhouse ME, Gowtage-Sequeria S. Host range and emerging and reemerging pathogens. Emerg Infect Dis 2005; 11: 1842 7. doi:

    2. McFarlane R, Sleigh A, McMichael A. Land-use change and emerging infectious disease on an Island Continent. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2013; 10: 2699.

    3. Anonymous. Responding to the threat of antimicrobial resistance: Australia's first National Antimicrobial Resistance Strategy 2015 2019. Canberra: Department of Health and Department of Agriculture; 2015, p. 48.

    4. Hamilton K, Nutter F, Olson DK, Steele J. USAID RESPOND project's global one health core competencies and one health modules. Ann Global Health 2015; 81: 150 1. doi: http://dx.

    5. Mor SM, Robbins AH, Jarvin L, Kaufman GE, Lindenmayer JM. Curriculum asset mapping for One Health education. J Vet Med Educ 2013; 40: 363 9. doi: 0525R.

    6. Australian Research Council. Grants dataset; 2016. Available from: [cited 13 September 2016].

    7. National Health and Medical Research Council. Research funding statistics and data; 2016. Available from: https://www. [cited 13 September 2016].

    8. Abraham S, Wong HS, Turnidge J, Johnson JR, Trott DJ. Carbapenemase-producing bacteria in companion animals: a public health concern on the horizon. J Antimicrob Chemother 2014; 69: 1155 7. doi:

    9. Blyton MD, Pi H, Vangchhia B, Abraham S, Trott DJ, Johnson JR, et al. Genetic structure and antimicrobial resistance of Escherichia coli and cryptic clades in birds with diverse human associations. Appl Environ Microbiol 2015; 81: 5123 33. doi:

    10. Groves MD, Crouch B, Coombs GW, Jordan D, Pang S, Barton MD, et al. Molecular epidemiology of methicillinresistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from Australian veterinarians. PLoS One 2016; 11: e0146034. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146034

  • Related Research Results (2)
  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark