Revised eddy covariance flux calculation methodologies - effect on urban energy balance

Article English OPEN
Nordbo, Annika ; Jarvi, Leena ; Vesala, Timo (2012)
  • Publisher: Tellus B
  • Journal: Tellus B (issn: 1600-0889, eissn: 0280-6509)
  • Related identifiers: doi: 10.3402/tellusb.v64i0.18184
  • Subject: CENTRAL-EUROPEAN CITY | OPEN-PATH | flux error | QUALITY-CONTROL | 114 Physical sciences | eddy covariance; urban; energy balance; flux uncertainty; flux error | energy balance | WATER-VAPOR | eddy covariance | SURFACE-ATMOSPHERE INTERACTIONS | FREQUENCY-RESPONSE CORRECTIONS | CORRELATION SYSTEMS | SONIC ANEMOMETER | urban | ANTHROPOGENIC HEAT | flux uncertainty | CO2 FLUXES

Eddy covariance (EC) measurements of turbulent fluxes of momentum, sensible heat and latent heat – in addition to net radiation measurements – were conducted for three consecutive years in an urban environment: Helsinki, Finland. The aims were to: (1) quantify the detection limit and random uncertainty of turbulent fluxes, (2) assess the systematic error caused by EC calculation-procedure choices on the energy balance residual and (3) report the energy balance of the world's northernmost urban flux station. The mean detection limits were about 10% of the observed flux, and the random uncertainty was 9–16%. Of all fluxes, the latent heat flux – as measured with a closed-path gas analyser – was most prone to systematic calculation errors due to water vapour interactions with tube walls: using a lag window that is too small can cause a 15% lack of data (due to the dependency of lag time on relative humidity) and omitting spectral corrections can cause on average a 26% underestimation of the flux. The systematic errors in EC calculation propagate into the energy balance residual and can be larger than the residual itself: for example, omitting spectral corrections overestimates the residual by 13% or 18% on average, depending on the analyser.Keywords: eddy covariance; urban; energy balance; flux uncertainty; flux error(Published: 19 April 2012)Citation: Tellus B 2012, 64, 18184,
  • References (64)
    64 references, page 1 of 7

    Aubinet, M., Grelle, A., Ibrom, A., Rannik, U¨ ., Moncrieff, J. and co-authors. 2000. Estimates of the annual net carbon and water exchange of forests: the EUROFLUX methodology. Adv. Ecol. Res. 30, 113 175.

    Bergeron, O. and Strachan, I. B. 2010. Wintertime radiation and energy budget along an urbanization gradient in Montreal, Canada. Int. J. Climatol. Online Library, 1 16.

    Best, M. J. 2005. Representing urban areas within operational numerical weather prediction models. Bound. -Layer Meteorol 114, 91 109.

    Billesbach, D. P. 2011. Estimating uncertainties in individual eddy covariance flux measurements: a comparison of methods and a proposed new method. Agric. For. Meteorol. 151, 394 405.

    Burba, G. and Anderson, D. 2010. A brief practical guide to eddy covariance flux measurements. LI-COR Biosci., 1 212. http:// Burba, G. G., McDermitt, D. K., Grelle, A., Anderson, D. J. and Xu, L. 2008. Addressing the influence of instrument surface heat exchange on the measurements of CO2 flux from open-path gas analyzers. Global Change Biol. 14, 1854 1876.

    Burns, S. P., Sun, J., Lenschow, D. H., Oncley, S. P., Stephens, B. B. and co-authors. 2011. Atmospheric stability effects on wind fields and scalar mixing within and just above a Subalpine forest in sloping terrain. Bound. -Layer Meteorol. 138, 231 262.

    Christen, A. and Vogt, R. 2004. Energy and radiation balance of a central European city. Int. J. Climatol. 24, 1395 1421.

    Clement, R. 2004. Mass and Energy Exchange Of A Plantation Forest In Scotland Using Micrometeorological Methods, Chapter 5. PhD Dissertation, University of Edinburgh, UK.

    Drebs, A., Nordlund, A., Karlsson, P., Helminen, J. and Rissanen, P. 2002. Tilastoja Suomen ilmastosta 1971 2000 [Climatological Statistics of Finland 1971 2000]. Finnish Meteorological Institute, Finland.

    EEA, 2006. Urban sprawl in Europe the ignored challenge. Europe. Env. Agency. 10, 1 60.

  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark