Complications and discomfort of bronchoscopy: a systematic review

Article English OPEN
Leiten, Elise Orvedal ; Martinsen, Einar Marius Hjellestad ; Eagan, Tomas Mikal ; Bakke, Per S. ; Grønseth, Rune (2016)
  • Publisher: Co-Action Publishing
  • Journal: European Clinical Respiratory Journal, volume 3 (eissn: 2001-8525)
  • Related identifiers: doi: 10.3402/ecrj.v3i0.33324, doi: 10.3402/ecrj.v3.33324, pmc: PMC5107637
  • Subject: patient satisfaction | Diagnostic bronchoscopy; Safety; Adverse events; Patient satisfaction; Informed consent. | Review Article | informed consent | diagnostic bronchoscopy | safety | adverse events

Objective: To identify bronchoscopy-related complications and discomfort, meaningful complication rates, and predictors.Method: We conducted a systematic literature search in PubMed on 8 February 2016, using a search strategy including the PICO model, on complications and discomfort related to bronchoscopy and related sampling techniques.Results: The search yielded 1,707 hits, of which 45 publications were eligible for full review. Rates of mortality and severe complications were low. Other complications, for instance, hypoxaemia, bleeding, pneumothorax, and fever, were usually not related to patient characteristics or aspects of the procedure, and complication rates showed considerable ranges. Measures of patient discomfort differed considerably, and results were difficult to compare between different study populations.Conclusion: More research on safety aspects of bronchoscopy is needed to conclude on complication rates and patient- and procedure-related predictors of complications and discomfort.Keywords: diagnostic bronchoscopy; safety; adverse events; patient satisfaction; informed consent(Published: 11 November 2016)Citation: European Clinical Respiratory Journal 2016, 3: 33324 - http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/ecrj.v3.33324
  • References (97)
    97 references, page 1 of 10

    1. Introduction to bronchoscopy. Cambridge University Press; 2009.

    2. Du Rand IA, Blaikley J, Booton R, Chaudhuri N, Gupta V, Khalid S, et al. British thoracic society guideline for diagnostic flexible bronchoscopy in adults: accredited by NICE. Thorax. 2013; 68(Suppl 1): i1 44.

    3. Wikipedia_contributors. PICO process: wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. 2016 [updated 9 January 2016 13:56 UTC]. Available from: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title PICO_process& oldid 698981503 [cited 5 June 2016].

    4. Kanemoto K, Satoh H, Ishikawa H, Ishikawa S, Ohtsuka M, Sekizawa K. Prospective study of fever and pneumonia after flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy in older people. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006; 54: 827 30.

    5. Elston WJ, Whittaker AJ, Khan LN, Flood-Page P, Ramsay C, Jeffery PK, et al. Safety of research bronchoscopy, biopsy and bronchoalveolar lavage in asthma. Eur Respir J. 2004; 24: 375 7.

    6. Hattotuwa K, Gamble EA, O'Shaughnessy T, Jeffery PK, Barnes NC. Safety of bronchoscopy, biopsy, and BAL in research patients with COPD. Chest. 2002; 122: 1909 12.

    7. de Fenoyl O, Capron F, Lebeau B, Rochemaure J. Transbronchial biopsy without fluoroscopy: a five year experience in outpatients. Thorax. 1989; 44: 956 9.

    8. Alzeer AH, Al-Otair HA, Al-Hajjaj MS. Yield and complications of flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy in a teaching hospital. Saudi Med J. 2008; 29: 55 9.

    9. Brimacombe J, Tucker P, Simons S. The laryngeal mask airway for awake diagnostic bronchoscopy. A retrospective study of 200 consecutive patients. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 1995; 12: 357 61.

    10. Pue CA, Pacht ER. Complications of fiberoptic bronchoscopy at a university hospital. Chest. 1995; 107: 430 2.

  • Related Research Results (1)
  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark