Dynamical structures for southwesterly airflow over southern Norway: the role of dissipation

Article English OPEN
Barstad, Idar (2006)
  • Publisher: Co-Action Publishing
  • Journal: Tellus A (issn: 1600-0870, eissn: 0280-6495)
  • Related identifiers: doi: 10.3402/tellusa.v58i1.14742
  • Subject:
    arxiv: Physics::Geophysics | Physics::Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics | Astrophysics::High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena

Earlier studies have revealed mesoscale structures in southwesterly flows over the mountains of southern Norway (Rossby number ∼1): a left-side jet and an upstream wind minimum as signs of the influence of rotation; a downstream wind shadow connected to inertio-gravity waves; a weak jet on the right side of the wind shadow and a shallow coastal wind shadowbetween the left-side jet and the main wind shadow. In the present study, the dynamics of the structures have been further examined from the results of experiments performed by a mesoscale numerical model and computations using a linear model with rotation included. Ideal atmospheric conditions for a large-scale wind direction from southwest have been used to initialize the numerical model. The sensitivity of mesoscale structures was studied with respect to dissipation from wave breaking and surface friction. Nonlinearity and dissipation in breaking waves are needed to explain the location, depth and strength of the downstream wind shadow. Increased wind to the right of the shadow was found to be generated by the effect of the Coriolis force as air was pulled towards the low-pressure perturbation behind the mountains. The coastal wind shadow was found to be a direct result of differential friction between land and ocean. Nonlinear experiments and an attempt to include boundary layer effects in linear theory showed that friction is reducing the effective height of the mountain and the signal of the mesoscale structures.
  • References (27)
    27 references, page 1 of 3

    Barstad, I. and Grøna˚s, S. 2005. Southwesterly flows over southern Norway-mesoscale sensitivity to large-scale wind direction and speed. Tellus 57A, 136-152.

    Burk, S. and Thompson, H. 1989. A vertically nested regional numerical prediction model with second-order closure physics. Mon. Wea. Rev. 117, 2305-2324.

    Doyle, J. D. and Shapiro, M. A. 1999. Flow response to large-scale topography: the Greeland tip jet. Tellus 51A, 728-748.

    Eliassen, A. and Palm, E. 1960. On the transfer of energy in the stationary mountain waves. Geofys. Publ. 22, 1-23.

    Gill, A. E. 1982. Atmosphere-Ocean Dynamics. International Geophysics series, Academic Press, NY, 662.

    Grell, G., Dudhia, J. and Stauffer, D. 1994. A Description of the FifthGeneration Penn State/NCAR Mesoscale Model (MM5). NCAR technical note NCAR/TNN-398+STR, Boulder, CO, U.S.A.

    Grubisˇic´, V., Smith, R. B. and Scha¨r, C. 1995. The effect of bottom friction on shallow-water flow past an isolated obstacle. J. Atmos. Sci. 50, 1985-2005.

    Klemp, J. B. and Lilly, D. K. 1978. Numerical Simulation of Hydrostatic Mountain Waves. J. Atmos. Sci. 35, 78-107.

    Lott, F. and Miller, M. J. 1997. A new subgrid-scale orographic drag parameterization: Its formulation and testing. Quart. J. R. Met. Soc. 123, 101-127.

    O´ lafsson, H. 2000. The impact of flow regimes on asymmetry of orographic drag at moderate and low Rossby numbers. Tellus 52A, 365- 379.

  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark