Effect of Bovine or Human Milk on the Establishment of Bifidobacterium bifidum and Some Other Bacteria from the Human Neonatal Microflora in Gnotobiotic Mice

Article English OPEN
Hudault, S. ; Bridonneau, C. ; Ducluzeau, R. ; Raibaud, P. (2011)
  • Publisher: Microbial Ecology in Health and Disease
  • Journal: Microbial Ecology in Health and Disease (issn: 1651-2235)
  • Related identifiers: doi: 10.3402/mehd.v4i1.7596
  • Subject:
    mesheuropmc: food and beverages | digestive system | fluids and secretions

A strain of Bifidobacterium bifidum which was dependent on bifidus factors was administered to four groups of germfree mice each receiving a different sample of human milk containing the same concentration of bifidus factors. The strain became established in three of the four groups in numbers varying between 5 x 107 and 1 x 1010/g faeces. B. bifidum also became established in numbers varying between 5 x 109 and 2 x 1010/g faeces in mono-associated mice receiving diets containing little or no bifidus factors. The caeca of all the germ-free mice examined contained bifidus factors in higher concentrations than in human milk. This concentration decreased in mice where B. bifidum was established. Thus, no relation was observed between the dietary concentration of bifidus factors and the faecal levels of B. bifidum. In addition, no antagonism was observed between B. bifidum and an Escherichia coli strain, a Klebsiella pneumoniae strain and a Bacteroides sp. strain, all isolated from the stools of newborn babies, although the caecal pH of mice receiving human milk fell to 5.2.Keywords: Bifidobacterium: Human neonatal intestinal microflora; Bifidus factors; Human milk; Gnotobiotic mice; Bacterial interactions.
  • References (22)
    22 references, page 1 of 3

    1. Aimutis WR, Kornogay ET, Eigel WN. (1985).In vitro antagonism of E. coli by piglet small intestine bacteria isolated by selective enrichment in media containing sow colostrum piglet feed or brain heart infusion. Journal of General and Applied Microbiology 31, 135-146.

    2. Aranki A, Syed SA, Kenney EB, Freter R. (1969). Isolation of anaerobic bacteria from human gingiva and mouse cecum by means of a simplifiedglove box procedure. Applied Microbiology 17,568-576.

    3. Barnes EM, Impey CS, Stevens BJH. (1979). Factors affecting the incidence and anti-Salmonella activity of the anaerobic caecal flora of the young chick. Journal of Hygiene 82,263-283.

    4. Beerens H, Romond C , Neut C.(1 980).Influence of breast-feeding on the bifid flora of the newborn intestine. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 33, 2434-2439.

    5 . BennoY,SawadaK,MitsuokaT.(1985).Theintestinal microflora of infants: composition of fecal flora in breast fed and bottle fed infants.Microbiology and Immunology 28,975-986.

    6. Bullen CL,Tearle PV, Willis AT. (1976).Bifidobacteria in the intestinaltract of infants: an in vivo study. Journal of Medical Microbiology 9,325-333.

    7. Bullen CL,Tearle PV, Stewart MG. (1977). The effect of “humanised” milks and supplemented breast feeding on the faecal flora of infants. Journal of Medical Microbiology 10,403-41 3.

    8. Cooperstock MS, Zedd AJ.(1983). Intestinal flora of infants. In: Hentges DJ (ed) Human Intestinal Microflora in Health and Disease. Academic, New York, pp 79-99.

    9. Ducluzeau R, Raibaud P. (1968). Influence de la vaccination sur l'implantationde Escherichia coli et de Staphylococcus pyogenes dans le tube digestif de la souris axenique. Annales de I'Institut Pasteur de Paris 114,846-856.

    10. Duval-Iflah Y,Ouriet MF, Moreau MC, Daniel N, Gabilan JC, Raibaud P. (1982).Implantation precoce d'une souchede Escherichia coli dans I'intestin de nouveau-nts humains: effet de barrikre vis-a-vis de souches de E . coli antibioresistantes. Annales de Microbiologie (Institut Pasteur) 133A, 393-408.

  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark