Model analysis of the influence of gas diffusivity in soil on CO and H2 uptake

Article English OPEN
Yonemura, S. ; Yokozawa, M. ; Kawashima, S. ; Tsuruta, H. (2011)

CO and H2 uptake by soil was studied as a diffusion process. A diffusion model was used to determine how the surface fluxes (net deposition velocities) were controlled by in-situ microbial uptake rates and soil gas diffusivity calculated from the 3-phase system (solid, liquid, gas) in the soil. Analytical solutions of the diffusion model assuming vertical uniformity of soil properties showed that physical properties such as air-filled porosity and soil gas diffusivity were more important in the uptake process than in the emission process. To incorporate the distribution of in-situ microbial uptake, we used a 2-layer model incorporating “a microbiologically inactive layer and an active layer” as suggested from experimental results. By numerical simulation using the 2-layer model, we estimated the effect of several factors on deposition velocities. The variations in soil gas diffusivity due to physical properties, i.e., soil moisture and air-filled porosity, as well as to the depth of the inactive layer and in-situ microbial uptake, were found to be important in controlling deposition velocities. This result shows that the diffusion process in soil is critically important for CO and H2 uptake by soil, at least in soils with higher in-situ uptake rates and/or with large variation in soil moisture. Similar uptake rates and the difference in deposition velocity between CO and H2 may be attributable to differences in CO and H2 molecular diffusivity. The inactive layer is resistant to diffusion and creates uptake limits in CO and H2 by soil. The coupling of high temperature and a thick inactive layer, common in arid soils, markedly lowers net CO deposition velocity. The temperature for maximum uptake of CO changes with depth of the inactive layer.DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0889.2000.d01-2.x
  • References (43)
    43 references, page 1 of 5

    Ball, B. C., Dobbie, K. E., Parker, J. P. and Smith, K. A. 1997a. The influence of gas transport and porosity on methane oxidation in soils. J. Geophys. Res. 102, 23301-23308.

    Ball, B. C., Smith, K. A., Klemedtsson, L., Brumme, R., Sitaula, B. K., Hansen, S., Prieme´, A., MacDonald, J. and Horgan, G. W. 1997b. The influence of soil gas transport properties on methane oxidation in a selection of northern european soils. J. Geophys. Res. 102, 23309-23317.

    Bender, M. and Conrad, R. 1994. Microbial oxidation of methane, ammonium and carbon monoxide, and turnover of nitrous oxide and nitric oxide in soils. Biogeochemistry 27, 97-112.

    Conrad, R. 1988. Biogeochemistry and ecophysiology of atmospheric CO and H2. Adv. Microb. Ecol. 10, 231-283.

    Conrad, R. and Seiler, W. 1980a. Contribution of hydrogen production by biological nitrogen fixation to the global hydrogen budget. J. Geophys. Res. 85, 5493-5498.

    Conrad, R. and Seiler, W. 1980b. Role of microorganisms in the consumption and production of atmospheric carbon monoxide by soil. Appl. Environ. Microb. 40, 437-445.

    Conrad, R. and Seiler, W. 1985a. Influence of temperature, moisture, and organic carbon on the flux of H2 and CO between soil and atmosphere: field studies in subtropical regions. J. Geophys. Res. 90, 5699-5709.

    Conrad, R. and Seiler, W. 1985b. Characteristics of abiological carbon monoxide formation from soil organic matter, humic acids, and phenolic compounds. Environ. Sci. T echnol. 19, 1165-1169.

    Conrad, R., Weber, M. and Seiler, W. 1983. Kinetics and electron transport of soil hydrogenases catalyzing the oxidation of atmospheric hydrogen. Soil Boil. Biochem. 15, 167-173.

    Do¨ rr, H., KatruV, L. and Levin, I. 1993. Soil texture parameterization of the methane uptake in aerated soils. Chemosphere 26, 697-713.

  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark