Implementing intimate partner violence care in a rural sub-district of South Africa: a qualitative evaluation

Article English OPEN
Rees, Kate ; Zweigenthal, Virginia ; Joyner, Kate (2014)
  • Publisher: Co-Action Publishing
  • Journal: Global Health Action, volume 7 (issn: 1654-9880, eissn: 1654-9716)
  • Related identifiers: pmc: PMC4165045, doi: 10.3402/gha.v7.24588
  • Subject: Intimate Partner Violence and Mental Health | health systems | RA1-1270 | Public aspects of medicine | mental health | health services | intimate partner violence | interpersonal violence | Gender Studies; Public Health; Health Systems; Health Services | domestic violence | interpersonal violence; intimate partner violence; domestic violence; mental health; health services; health systems | Public Health

Background: Despite a high burden of disease, in South Africa, intimate partner violence (IPV) is known to be poorly recognised and managed. To address this gap, an innovative intersectoral model for the delivery of comprehensive IPV care was piloted in a rural sub-district.Objective: To evaluate the initiative from the perspectives of women using the service, service providers, and managers.Design: A qualitative evaluation was conducted. Service users were interviewed, focus groups were conducted amongst health care workers (HCW), and a focus group and interviews were conducted with the intersectoral implementation team to explore their experiences of the intervention. A thematic analysis approach was used, triangulating the various sources of data.Results: During the pilot, 75 women received the intervention. Study participants described their experience as overwhelmingly positive, with some experiencing improvements in their home lives. Significant access barriers included unaffordable indirect costs, fear of loss of confidentiality, and fear of children being removed from the home. For HCW, barriers to inquiry about IPV included its normalisation in this community, poor understanding of the complexities of living with violence and frustration in managing a difficult emotional problem. Health system constraints affected continuity of care, privacy, and integration of the intervention into routine functioning, and the process of intersectoral action was hindered by the formation of alliances. Contextual factors, for example, high levels of alcohol misuse and socio-economic disempowerment, highlighted the need for a multifaceted approach to addressing IPV.Conclusions: This evaluation draws attention to the need to take a systems approach and focus on contextual factors when implementing complex interventions. The results will be used to inform decisions about instituting appropriate IPV care in the rest of the province. In addition, there is a pressing need for clear policies and guidelines framing IPV as a health issue.Keywords: interpersonal violence; intimate partner violence; domestic violence; mental health; health services; health systems(Published: 12 September 2014)Citation: Glob Health Action 2014, 7: 24588 - http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/gha.v7.24588SPECIAL ISSUE: This paper is part of the Special Issue: Intimate Partner Violence and Mental Health. More papers from this issue can be found at http://www.globalhealthaction.net
  • References (40)
    40 references, page 1 of 4

    1. World Health Organization (2013). Global and regional estimates of violence against women: prevalence and health effects of intimate partner violence and non-partner sexual violence. Geneva: World Health Organization.

    2. Norman R, Bradshaw D, Schneider M, Jewkes R, Mathews S, Abrahams N. Estimating the burden of disease attributable to interpersonal violence in South Africa in 2000. S Afr Med J 2007; 97: 653 6.

    3. Abrahams N, Jewkes R, Laubscher R, Hoffman M, Health DC. Intimate partner violence: prevalence and risk factors for men in Cape Town, South Africa. Violence Vict 2006; 21: 247 64.

    4. Jewkes R, Penn-kekana L, Levin J, Ratsaka M, Schrieber M. ''He must give me money, he mustn't beat me'' violence against women in three South African provinces. Pretoria: South African Medical Research Council; 1999.

    5. Jina R, Jewkes R, Hoffman S, Dunkle K, Nduna M, Shai N. Adverse mental health outcomes associated with emotional abuse in young rural South African women: a cross-sectional study. J Interpers Violence 2012; 27: 862 80.

    6. Ellsberg M, Jansen HAFM, Heise L, Watts CH, Garc´ıa-moreno C. Intimate partner violence and women's physical and mental health in the WHO multi-country study on women's health and domestic violence: an observational study. Lancet 2008; 371: 1165 72.

    7. Sharps PW, Laughon K, Giangrande SK. Intimate partner violence and the childbearing year: maternal and infant health consequences. Trauma Violence Abuse 2007; 8: 105 16.

    8. Dunkle KL, Jewkes RK, Brown HC, Gray GE, McIntryre JA, Harlow SD. Gender-based violence, relationship power, and risk of HIV infection in women attending antenatal clinics in South Africa. Lancet 2004; 363: 1415 21.

    9. World Health Organization (2013). Responding to intimate partner and sexual violence against women: WHO clinical and policy guidelines. Geneva: World Health Organization.

    10. Colombini M, Mayhew SH, Ali SH, Shuib R, Watts C. An integrated health sector response to violence against women in Malaysia: lessons for supporting scale up. BMC Public Health 2012; 12: 548.

  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark