Comparison of equilibrium and transient responses to CO2 increase in eight state-of-the-art climate models

Article English OPEN
Yokohata, Tokuta ; Emori, Seita ; Nozawa, Toru ; Ogura, Tomoo ; Kawamiya, Michio ; Tsushima, Yoko ; Suzuki, Tatsuo ; Yukimoto, Seiji ; Abe-Ouchi, Ayako ; Hasumi, Hiroyasu ; Sumi, Akimasa ; Kimoto, Masahide (2008)

We compared the climate response of doubled CO2 equilibrium experiments (2 × CO2) by atmosphere–slab ocean coupled general circulation models (ASGCMs) and that of 1% per year CO2 increase experiments (1%CO2 by atmosphere–ocean coupled general circulation models (AOGCMs) using eight state-of-the-art climate models. Climate feedback processes in 2 × CO2 are different from those in 1%CO2, and the equilibrium climate sensitivity (T2×) in 2 × CO2 is different from the effective climate sensitivity (T2×,eff) in 1%CO2. The difference between T2× and T2×,eff is from −1.3 to 1.6 K, a large part of which can be explained by the difference in the ice-albedo and cloud feedback. The largest contribution is cloud SW feedback, and the difference in cloud SW feedback for 2 × CO2 and 1%CO2 could be determined by the distribution of the SAT anomaly which causes differences in the atmospheric thermal structure. An important factor which determines the difference in ice-albedo feedback is the initial sea ice distribution at the Southern Ocean, which is generally overestimated in 2 × CO2 as compared to 1%CO2 and observation. Through the comparison of climate feedback processes in 2 ×CO2 and 1%CO2, the possible behaviour of the time evolution of T2×,eff is discussed.
  • References (53)
    53 references, page 1 of 6

    Boer, G. J. and Yu, B. 2003. Dynamical aspects of climate sensitivity. Geophys. Res. Lett. 30, 1135, doi:10.1029/2002GL016549.

    Bony, S. and Dufresne, J.-L. 2005. Marine boundary layer clouds at the heart of tropical cloud feedback uncertainties in climate models. Geophys. Res. Lett. 32, L20806, doi:10.1029/2005GL023851.

    Cess, R. D., Potter, G. L., Blanchet, J. P., Boer, G. L., Del Genio, A. D. and co-authors. 1990. Intercomparison and interpretation of climate feedback processes in 19 atmospheric general circulation models. J. Geophys. Res. 95, 16 601-16 615.

    Collins, W. D., Rasch, P. J., Boville, B. A., Hack, J. J., McCaa, J. R. and co-authors. 2004. Description of the NCAR Community Atmosphere Model (CAM3.0). Technical Note TN-464+STR, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, 214pp.

    Collins, W. D., Booth, B. B. B., Harris, G. R., Murphy, J. M., Sexton, D. M. H. and co-authors. 2006. Towards quantifying uncertainty in transient climate change. Clim. Dyn. 27, 127-147.

    Colman, R. A. 2003. A comparison of climate feedbacks in general circulation model. Clim. Dyn. 20, 865-873.

    Diansky, N. A., Bagno, A. V. and Zalensny, V. B. 2002. Sigma model of global ocean circulation and its sensitivity to variations in wind stress. Izv. Atmos. Ocean. Phys. 38, 477-494.

    Flato, G. M. 2005. The Third Generation Coupled Global Climate Model (CGCM3).

    Forster, P. M. D. and Taylor, K. E. 2006. Climate Forcings and climate sensitivities diagnosed from coupled climate model integrations. J. Clim. 19, 6181-6194.

    Galin, V. Ya, Volodin, E. M. and Smyshliaev, S. P. 2003. Atmospheric general circulation model of INM RAS with ozone dynamics. Russ. Meteorol. Hydrol. 5, 13-22.

  • Similar Research Results (1)
  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark