Dietary investigations - what are the effects of invalid selection procedures and measurement errors?

Article English OPEN
Berglund, Lars (1998)
  • Publisher: Co-Action Publishing
  • Journal: Food & Nutrition Research (issn: 1654-661X)
  • Related identifiers: doi: 10.3402/fnr.v42i0.1763

In observational studies where average levels or percentiles in a population distribution of nutritional components are to be assessed it is essential that the participating subjects are representative of the population to which the results are to be generalised. The optimum way of achieving this is by random selection from the target population in which all members have equal probability (or at least a known probability) of being chosen and also that all selected subjects participate in the study. The effects of selection bias and non-response can be large and are in general difficult to estimate. In the presentation of results it should always be stated how selection bias and non-response could have influenced the results. In this paper a general selection procedure and certain problems with it is presented. A method for correction of nonresponse bias is also presented. The effect of measurement errors on correlation coefficients between nutritional components or between a nutritional component and other variables is discussed.
  • References (6)

    Hansen MH, Hunvitz WN: The problem of nonresponse in sample surveys. J Am Stat Assoc l946;41;517-29.

    Shortt CT,Duthie GG,Robertson JD,Morrice PC, Nicol F, Arthur JR: Selenium status of a group of Scottish adults. Eur J Clin Nutr 1997; 51;400-4.

    Harbottle L, Duggan MB: Dietary assessment in Asian children - a comparison of the weighed inventory and diet history methods. Eur J Clin Nutr 1993;47;666-72.

    Jeffery RW, French SA, Forster JL,Spry VM: Socio-economic status differences in health behaviors related to obesity: the Health Worker Project. Int J Obesity 1991;15;689-96.

    Bolton-Smith C, Woodward M: Antioxidant vitamin adequacy in relation to consumption of sugars. Eur J Clin Nutr 1995;49;124-33.

    Rosner B, Willett WC: Interval estimates for correlation coefficients corrected for withinperson variation: implications for study design and hypothesis testing. Am J Epidemiol 1988; 127;377-86. U

  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark