A simple global carbon and energy coupled cycle model for global warming simulation: sensitivity to the light saturation effect

Article English OPEN
Ichii, Kazuhito ; Matsui, Yohei ; Murakami, Kazutaka ; Mukai, Toshikazu ; Yamaguchi, Yasushi ; Ogawa, Katsuro (2011)

A simple Earth system model, the Four-Spheres Cycle of Energy and Mass (4-SCEM) model, has been developed to simulate global warming due to anthropogenic CO2 emission. The model consists of the Atmosphere–Earth Heat Cycle (AEHC) model, the Four Spheres Carbon Cycle (4-SCC) model, and their feedback processes. The AEHC model is a one-dimensional radiative convective model, which includes the greenhouse effect of CO2 and H2O, and one cloud layer. The 4-SCC model is a box-type carbon cycle model, which includes biospheric CO2 fertilization, vegetation area variation, the vegetation light saturation effect and the HILDA oceanic carbon cycle model. The feedback processes between carbon cycle and climate considered in the model are temperature dependencies of water vapor content, soil decomposition and ocean surface chemistry. The future status of the global carbon cycle and climate was simulated up to the year 2100 based on the “business as usual” (IS92a) emission scenario, followed by a linear decline in emissions to zero in the year 2200. The atmospheric CO2 concentration reaches 645 ppmv in 2100 and a peak of 760 ppmv approximately in the year 2170, and becomes a steady state with 600 ppmv. The projected CO2 concentration was lower than those of the past carbon cycle studies, because we included the light saturation effect of vegetation. The sensitivity analysis showed that uncertainties derived from the light saturation effect of vegetation and land use CO2 emissions were the primary cause of uncertainties in projecting future CO2 concentrations. The climate feedback effects showed rather small sensitivities compared with the impacts of those two effects. Satellite-based net primary production trends analyses can somewhat decrease the uncertainty in quantifying CO2 emissions due to land use changes. On the other hand, as the estimated parameter in vegetation light saturation was poorly constrained, we have to quantify and constrain the effect more accurately.DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0889.2003.00035.x
  • References (52)
    52 references, page 1 of 6

    Bacastow, R. B. and Keeling, C. D. 1973. Atmospheric carbon dioxide and radiocarbon in the natural carbon cycle: II Changes from A.D. 1700 to 2070 as deduced from a geochemical model. In: Carbon and the biosphere (eds. G. M. Woodwell and E. V. Pecan). Rep. CONF-720510. US Atomic Energy Commission, Washington, DC, 86- 135.

    Cao, M. and Woodward, F. I. 1998. Dynamic responses of terrestrial ecosystem carbon cycling to global climate change. Nature 393, 249-252.

    Charlson, R. J. 2000. The coupling of biogeochemical cycles and climate: forcings, feedbacks, and responses. In: Earth system sciences (eds. M. C. Jacobson, R. J. Charlson, H. Rodhe and G. H. Orians). Academic Press, London, 439- 458.

    Cox, P. M., Betts, R. A., Jones, C. D., Spall, S. A. and Totterdell, I. J. 2000. Acceleration of global warming due to carbon-cycle feedbacks in a coupled climate model. Nature 408, 184-187.

    Craig, S. G. and Holme´n, K. J. 1995. Uncertainties in future CO2 projections. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 9, 139- 152.

    Cramer, W., Bondeau, A., Woodward, F. I., Prentice, I. C., Betts, R. A., Brovkin, V., Cox, P. M., Fisher, V., Foley, J. A., Friend, A. D., Kucharik, C., Lomas, M. R., Ramankutty, N., Sitch, S., Smith, B., White, A. and Yong-Molling, C. 2001. Global response of terrestrial ecosystem structure and function to CO2 and climate change: results from six dynamic global vegetation models. Global Change Biol. 7, 357-373.

    Cramer, W., Kicklighter D. W., Bondeau, A., Moore III, B., Churkina, G., Nemry, B., Ruimy, A., Schloss, A. L. and the participants of the Potsdam NPP model intercomparison. 1999. Comparing global models of terrestrial net primary productivity (NPP): Overview and key results. Global Change Biol. 5, 1-15.

    Enting, I. G., Wigley, T. M. L. and Heimann, M. 1994. Future emissions and concentrations of carbon dioxide: Key ocean/atmosphere/land analysis. CSIRO Division of Atmospheric Res. Tech. Pap. 31, Victoria, Australia.

    Etheridge, D. M., Steele, L. P., Langenfelds, R. L., Francey, R. J., Barnola, J. M. and Morgan, V. I., 1998. Historical CO2 records from the Law Dome DE08, DE08-02, and DSS ice cores. In: Trends: A compendium of data on global change, Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA.

    Fujii, M., Ikeda, M. and Yamanaka, Y. 2000. Roles of physical processes in the carbon cycle using a simplified physical model. J. Oceanogr. 56, 655-666.

  • Related Research Results (2)
  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark