Primary production in polar waters: relation to nutrient availability

Article English OPEN
Harrison, W. G. ; Cota, G. F. (1991)

Temperature, light and dissolved nutrients are considered the “master” abiotic properties controlling primary production in the ocean. Each of these properties, in turn, is influenced by water column stability Sustained research over the past several decades has endeavored to ascertain which of these properties is most important in regulating phytoplankton growth. In no region has this research effort been more evident than at high latitudes. For both polar regions, extremes in each of these properties are the rule in surface waters where phytoplankton grows: the lowest ocean temperatures, the greatest seasonal excursion in incident solar radiation, and the highest dissolved nutrient concentrations. Based largely on indirect evidence, early researchers speculated that polar primary production was high relative to production at lower latitudes. This was commonly attributed to the abundant surface “macronutrients” (NO3, PO4, H4SiO4) since physiological adaptations to the suboptimum temperatures and light were thought to characterize these high latitude populations. Intensification of polar research since the late 1960's has in many respects modified this view. Current perspectives are that important differences exist between the Arctic and Antarctic with regard to the availability and role nutrients play in regulating primary production. In general much less emphasis is now placed on the significance of the macronutrients in the Antarctic although there is speculation and some evidence that “micronutrients” (Fe) may be important. Macronutrient availability appears to play a more important, though secondary, role in the Arctic, that of sustaining rather than initiating phytoplankton growth. This paper reviews early, contemporary, and present research addressing the question, “What role does nutrient availability play in the distribution and magnitude of primary production in Arctic and Antarctic waters?” Emphasis is placed on new research on under-ice communities as well as on the historically studied pelagic communities.
  • References (89)
    89 references, page 1 of 9

    Alcxander. V. & Niebaucr. H . J . 1981: Occanography of the eastern Bering Sea ice-edge in spring. Limnd. Oceanogr. 26, 1 I 1 1-1 125.

    Alexander. V & Niehauer. H . J . 1989: Recent studies of phytoplankton blooms at the ice edge in the Southeast Bering Sea. Rupp. P..ii. RCun. Cons. Inr. Explor. M e r 188. 91107.

    Anderson. G . C.. Parsons. T. R. & Stephens. K . 1969: Nitrate distribution In the subarctic Northeast Pacific Ocean. DeepSea Res. 16. 329-334.

    Bainbridge. A. E. 1976a: GEOSECS Atlantic final hydrographic data report. GEOSECS Operations Group. Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla. California.

    Bainbridge. A . E . 1976b: GEOSECS Pacific final hydrographic data report. GEOSECS Operations Group, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, California.

    Banse, K. 1990: Does iron really limit phytoplankton production in the offshore subarctic Pacific? Limnol. Oceanogr. 35,772-775.

    Banse. K. 1991: Iron availability,nitrate uptake. and exportable production in the subarctic Pacific. J. Geophys. Res. 96,741- 748.

    Berger. W. H. 1989: Global maps of ocean productivity. Pp. 429-455 in Berger, W. H., Smetacek. V. S. & Wefer, G. (eds.): Productivify of the Ocean: Present and Past. Wilcy Intencience, New York.

    Brzezinski, M. A . 1985: The Si:C:N ratio of marine diatoms: interspecific variability and the effect of some environmental variables. J. Phycol. 21. 347-357.

    Buckley, J . R., G a m m e l s r ~ d T,., Johannessen. J . A.. Johannessen. 0. M. & Reed. L. P. 1979: Upwelling: Oceanic structure at the edge of the Arctic pack ice in winter. Science 203, 165-167.

  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark