Female genital mutilation: a systematic review of research on its economic and social impacts across four decades

Article English OPEN
Mpinga, Emmanuel Kabengele ; Macias, Aurélie ; Hasselgård-Rowe, Jennifer ; Kandala, Ngianga-Bakwin ; Félicien, Tshimungu Kandolo ; Verloo, Henk ; Bukonda, Ngoyi K. Zacharie ; Chastonay, Philippe (2016)
  • Publisher: Co-Action Publishing
  • Journal: Global Health Action, volume 9 (issn: 1654-9880, eissn: 1654-9716)
  • Related identifiers: pmc: PMC5052514, doi: 10.3402/gha.v9.31489, doi: 10.3402/gha.v%v.31489
  • Subject: socioeconomic consequences | Review Article | Africa | female genital mutilation; systematic review; Africa; medical and psychological consequences; prevalence and ethics; socioeconomic consequences | female genital mutilation | systematic review | Medicine and Society | RA1-1270 | L100 | prevalence and ethics | Public aspects of medicine | Public Health, Global Health, Gender Studies | medical and psychological consequences | L400 | B900
    • ddc: ddc:613

Background: Global efforts to end female genital mutilation (FGM) have intensified in recent decades because of the rising awareness that such a practice is an act of extreme violence against women and girls. Articles on FGM have been published highlighting the combined efforts of international and non-governmental organizations, governments, as well as religious and civil society groups to end the practice. However, the consequences of this research are not well known, and it seems that the socioeconomic aspects of the practice are underreported.Objective: This review aims to characterize over a 40-year period the scientific output on the consequences of FGM in African countries, the most affected region known for the high prevalence of FGM, and review data on the socioeconomic consequences of the practice.Design: A systematic review of literature was done, looking at the following databases: PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, BDSP, Web of Science, PsycINFO, FRANCIS, Sociological Abstracts, WHOLIS, RERO, and SAPHIR. The analysis was limited to articles concerning the African continent, published in English and French, from January 1, 1972, to December 31, 2011.Results: One hundred ninety-eight articles were reviewed. More than half of the articles were published during the last decade of the study period. The majority of papers were published in biomedical journals (64.1%). Most studies looked at Africa as a region (33.3%). Nigeria was the single country most investigated (19.2%), followed by Egypt (10.6%). Most first authors were affiliated to non-African countries (60.6%): among them 21.2% were US-based, 4% were from African institutions, and 16.2% from Nigeria.The medical and psychological consequences (51.5%) and the prevalence and ethics of the practice (34.4%) were the most frequently investigated topics. The socioeconomic consequences were addressed in a minority of the papers (14.1%): they were classified into direct economic consequences (2.5%), school attendance (1%), marriageability (2%), sexual and marital consequences (3.5%), fertility (2.5%), domestic violence (1%), and discrimination (1.5%).Conclusions: The publication of articles on the consequences of FGM is increasing, but there is little research on the socioeconomic consequences of the practice. More scientific data focusing on this dimension is necessary to strengthen prevention, advocacy, and intervention campaigns.Keywords: female genital mutilation; systematic review; Africa; medical and psychological consequences; prevalence and ethics; socioeconomic consequences(Published: 4 October 2016)Citation: Glob Health Action 2016, 9: 31489 - http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/gha.v9.31489
  • References (55)
    55 references, page 1 of 6

    1. UNICEF (2013). Female genital mutilation/cutting: a statistical overview and exploration of the dynamics of change. New York: UNICEF.

    2. United Nations Human Rights. Declaration on the elimination of violence against women. Available from: http://www.ohchr. org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/ViolenceAgainstWomen.aspx [cited 6 May 2015].

    3. World Health Organization. Sexual and reproductive health. Available from: http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/about_ us/en/ [cited 6 May 2014].

    4. Ras-Work B. Legislation to address the issue of female genital mutilation. United Nations Women Watch; 2009. Available from: http://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/egm/vaw_legislation_2009/ Expert Paper EGMGPLHP _Berhane Ras-Work revised_.pdf [cited 7 May 2015].

    5. Muthumbi J, Svanemyr J, Scolaro E, Temmerman M, Say L. Female genital mutilation: a literature review of the current status of legislation and policies in 27 African countries and Yemen. Afr J Reprod Health 2015; 19: 32 40.

    6. ACHPR. Protocol to the African charter on human and people's rights on the rights of women in Africa. African Commission on Human and People's Rights; 2003. Available from: http://www. achpr.org/instruments/women-protocol/ratification/ [cited 7 May 2015].

    7. OHCHR. Convention on the elimination of all forms of discrimination against women 1979. Available from: http://www. ohchr.org/Documents/ProfessionalInterest/cedaw.pdf [cited 15 July 2016].

    8. World Health Organization. Media Centre fact sheet N8214 [updated February 2016]. Available from: www.who.int/ mediacentre/factsheets/fs241/en/ [cited 4 May 2015].

    9. European Parliament. European Parliament resolution of 24 March 2009 on combating female genital mutilation in the EU (2008/2071(IN) [updated December 2009]. Available from: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef -//EP// TEXT TA P6-TA-2009-0161 0 DOC XML V0//EN [cited 4 May 2015].

    10. European Parliament. European Parliament resolution of 14 June 2012 on ending female genital mutilation (2012/2684(RSP)) [updated September 2013]. Available from: http://www.europarl. europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type TA&reference P7-TA-2012- 0261&format XML&language EN [cited 4 May 2015].

  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark