Medical student web-based formative assessment tool for renal pathology

Article English OPEN
Bijol, Vanesa ; Byrne-Dugan, Cathryn J. ; Hoenig, Melanie P. (2015)

Background: Web-based formative assessment tools have become widely recognized in medical education as valuable resources for self-directed learning.Objectives: To explore the educational value of formative assessment using online quizzes for kidney pathology learning in our renal pathophysiology course.Methods: Students were given unrestricted and optional access to quizzes. Performance on quizzed and non-quizzed materials of those who used (‘quizzers’) and did not use the tool (‘non-quizzers’) was compared. Frequency of tool usage was analyzed and satisfaction surveys were utilized at the end of the course.Results: In total, 82.6% of the students used quizzes. The greatest usage was observed on the day before the final exam. Students repeated interactive and more challenging quizzes more often. Average means between final exam scores for quizzed and unrelated materials were almost equal for ‘quizzers’ and ‘non-quizzers’, but ‘quizzers’ performed statistically better than ‘non-quizzers’ on both, quizzed (p=0.001) and non-quizzed (p=0.024) topics. In total, 89% of surveyed students thought quizzes improved their learning experience in this course.Conclusions: Our new computer-assisted learning tool is popular, and although its use can predict the final exam outcome, it does not provide strong evidence for direct improvement in academic performance. Students who chose to use quizzes did well on all aspects of the final exam and most commonly used quizzes to practice for final exam. Our efforts to revitalize the course material and promote learning by adding interactive online formative assessments improved students’ learning experience overall.Keywords: curriculum; quiz; formative assessment; medical education; pathology (Published: 31 March 2015)Citation: Med Educ Online 2015, 20: 26765 - 
  • References (24)
    24 references, page 1 of 3

    1. Prober CG, Khan S. Medical education reimagined: a call to action. Acad Med 2013; 88: 1407 10.

    2. Sharma N, Lau CS, Doherty I, Harbutt D. How we flipped the medical classroom. Med Teach 2014; 37: 1 4.

    3. Buchanan T. The efficacy of a World-Wide Web mediated formative assessment. J Comput Assist Lear 2000; 16: 193 200.

    4. Kibble JD, Johnson TR, Khalil MK, Nelson LD, Riggs GH, Borrero JL, et al. Insights gained from the analysis of performance and participation in online formative assessment. Teach Learn Med 2011; 23: 125 9.

    5. Wang T-H. Web-based quiz-game-like formative assessment: development and evaluation. Comput Educ 2008; 51: 1247 63.

    6. Velan GM, Jones P, McNeil HP, Kumar RK. Integrated online formative assessments in the biomedical sciences for medical students: benefits for learning. BMC Med Educ 2008; 8: 52.

    7. Ellaway R, Masters K. AMEE Guide 32: e-Learning in medical education Part 1: learning, teaching and assessment. Med Teach 2008; 30: 455 73.

    8. Pierce R, Fox J. Vodcasts and active-learning exercises in a ''flipped classroom'' model of a renal pharmacotherapy module. Am J Pharm Educ 2012; 76: 196.

    9. Rosner M, Parker M, Kohan D. Nephrology as a career choice: a survey of medical students. J Am Soc Nephrol 2009; 20: 767A.

    10. Hoenig MP, Shapiro E, Hladik GA. Lessons learned from the ASN renal educator listserv and survey. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2013; 8: 105460.

  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark