On the dynamics of the equatorial undercurrent

Article English OPEN
HUGHES, ROGER L. (2011)

Using three different distributions of potential vorticity, it is shown that the velocity field in the equatorial undercurrent is not necessarily unique in an inviscid ocean. The uniqueness of the velocity field is a function of both the thickness of the layer through which the undercurrent flows and the distribution of potential vorticity. For the distributions studied here there is one solution for a large layer thickness. As the layer thickness decreases, a second solution forms. These two solutions then coalesce and vanish as the layer thickness reduces further. Increased baroclinic behaviour qualitatively has the same effect as increased layer thickness. When two solutions are present, the narrower of the solutions widens as the layer thickness decreases, while the wider solution narrows.DOI: 10.1111/j.2153-3490.1979.tb00923.x
  • References (8)

    Fofonoff, N. P. 1954. Steady flow in a frictionless homogeneous ocean. J . Mar. Res. I3,254-262.

    Fofonoff, N. P. and Montgomery, R. B. 1955. The equatorial undercurrent in the light of the vorticity equation. Tellus 7, 518-521.

    Gill, A. E. 1975. Models of the equatorial currents. In Numerical models of ocean circulation. National Academy of Science, 18 1-203.

    Ichiye, T. 1964. An essay of the equatorial current system. In Studies on oceanography (ed. K. Yoshida), pp. 38-46. Seattle: University of Washington Press.

    Lemasson, L. and Piton, B. 1968. Cah. ORSTOM, Ser.

    Oceanogr. 6,39-46.

    Philander, S . G. H. 1973. Equatorial undercurrent: measurements and theories. Rev. Geophy. and Space Phy., I I , 5 13-5 10.

    Streeter, V. L. 1971. Fluid mechanics, 5th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.

  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark