
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
Observation of $a_0(1710)^+ \to K_S^0K^+$ in study of the $D_s^+\to K_S^0K^+\pi^0$ decay
Observation of $a_0(1710)^+ \to K_S^0K^+$ in study of the $D_s^+\to K_S^0K^+\pi^0$ decay
Using $e^+e^-$ annihilation data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 6.32 fb$^{-1}$ collected at center-of-mass energies between 4.178 GeV and 4.226 GeV with the BESIII detector, we perform the first amplitude analysis of the decay $D_s^+\to K_S^0K^+\pi^0$ and determine the relative branching fractions and phases for intermediate processes. We observe the $a_0(1710)^+$, the isovector partner of the $f_0(1710)$ and $f_0(1770)$ mesons, in its decay to $K_S^0K^+$ for the first time. In addition, we measure the ratio $\frac{\mathcal{B}(D_{s}^{+} \to \bar{K}^{*}(892)^{0}K^{+})}{\mathcal{B}(D_{s}^{+} \to \bar{K}^{0}K^{*}(892)^{+})}$ to be $2.35^{+0.42}_{-0.23\text{stat.}}\pm 0.10_{\rm syst.}$. Finally, we provide a precision measurement of the absolute branching fraction $\mathcal{B}(D_s^+\to K_S^0K^+\pi^0) = (1.46\pm 0.06_{\text{stat.}}\pm 0.05_{\text{syst.}})\%$.
Comment: 8 pages, 3 figures
High Energy Physics - Experiment
High Energy Physics - Experiment
26 references, page 1 of 3
M. G. Zhao37, Q. Zhao1, S. J. Zhao74, Y. B. Zhao1,51, Y. X. Zhao26,56, Z. G. Zhao65,51, A. Zhemchugov30,a, B. Zheng66,
J. P. Zheng1,51, Y. H. Zheng56, B. Zhong35, C. Zhong66, X. Zhong52, H. Zhou43, L. P. Zhou1,56, X. Zhou70, X. K. Zhou56,
[2] L. R. Dai, E. Oset and L. S. Geng, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 225 (2022).
[3] E. Klempt, Phys. Lett. B 820, 136512 (2021).
[4] A.V. Sarantsev, I. Denisenko, U. Thoma, and E. Klempt, Phys. Lett. B 816, 136227 (2021).
[5] M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), arXiv:2202.00621 [hep-ex].
[6] M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), arXiv:2202.00623 [hep-ex].
[7] J. P. Lees et al. (BaBar Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D, 104, 072002 (2021). Comput. Phys. Commun. 130, 260 (2000).
[8] M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), [26] D. J. Lange, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 462, 152 (2001); Phys. Rev. D 105, L051103 (2022). R. G. Ping, Chin. Phys. C 32, 599 (2008).
[9] M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), [27] J. C. Chen, G. S. Huang, X. R. Qi, D. H. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D 104, 012016 (2021). and Y. S. Zhu, Phys. Rev. D 62, 034003 (2000); [10] N. N. Achasov and V. N. Ivanchenko, R. L. Yang, R. G. Ping and H. Chen, Nucl. Phys. B, 315, 465 (1989). Chin. Phys. Lett. 31, 061301 (2014).
1 Research products, page 1 of 1
- 2012IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).0 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).0 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average Powered byBIP!

- Funder: European Commission (EC)
- Project Code: 758462
- Funding stream: H2020 | ERC | ERC-STG
- Funder: European Commission (EC)
- Project Code: 894790
- Funding stream: H2020 | MSCA-IF-GF
Using $e^+e^-$ annihilation data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 6.32 fb$^{-1}$ collected at center-of-mass energies between 4.178 GeV and 4.226 GeV with the BESIII detector, we perform the first amplitude analysis of the decay $D_s^+\to K_S^0K^+\pi^0$ and determine the relative branching fractions and phases for intermediate processes. We observe the $a_0(1710)^+$, the isovector partner of the $f_0(1710)$ and $f_0(1770)$ mesons, in its decay to $K_S^0K^+$ for the first time. In addition, we measure the ratio $\frac{\mathcal{B}(D_{s}^{+} \to \bar{K}^{*}(892)^{0}K^{+})}{\mathcal{B}(D_{s}^{+} \to \bar{K}^{0}K^{*}(892)^{+})}$ to be $2.35^{+0.42}_{-0.23\text{stat.}}\pm 0.10_{\rm syst.}$. Finally, we provide a precision measurement of the absolute branching fraction $\mathcal{B}(D_s^+\to K_S^0K^+\pi^0) = (1.46\pm 0.06_{\text{stat.}}\pm 0.05_{\text{syst.}})\%$.
Comment: 8 pages, 3 figures