You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
Evolution and Transformation of Scientific Knowledge over the Sphaera Corpus: A Network Study
Evolution and Transformation of Scientific Knowledge over the Sphaera Corpus: A Network Study
We investigated the evolution and transformation of scientific knowledge in the early modern period, analyzing more than 350 different editions of textbooks used for teaching astronomy in European universities from the late fifteenth century to mid-seventeenth century. These historical sources constitute the Sphaera Corpus. By examining different semantic relations among individual parts of each edition on record, we built a multiplex network consisting of six layers, as well as the aggregated network built from the superposition of all the layers. The network analysis reveals the emergence of five different communities. The contribution of each layer in shaping the communities and the properties of each community are studied. The most influential books in the corpus are found by calculating the average age of all the out-going and in-coming links for each book. A small group of editions is identified as a transmitter of knowledge as they bridge past knowledge to the future through a long temporal interval. Our analysis, moreover, identifies the most disruptive books. These books introduce new knowledge that is then adopted by almost all the books published afterwards until the end of the whole period of study. The historical research on the content of the identified books, as an empirical test, finally corroborates the results of all our analyses.
Comment: 19 pages, 9 figures
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Physics - Physics and Society, Physics - History and Philosophy of Physics, History and Philosophy of Physics (physics.hist-ph), FOS: Physical sciences, Computer Science - Digital Libraries, Digital Libraries (cs.DL), Physics and Society (physics.soc-ph)
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Physics - Physics and Society, Physics - History and Philosophy of Physics, History and Philosophy of Physics (physics.hist-ph), FOS: Physical sciences, Computer Science - Digital Libraries, Digital Libraries (cs.DL), Physics and Society (physics.soc-ph)
3414
1. Kuhn, T. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Univ. Chicago Press, 1996).
2. Uzzi, B., Mukherjee, S., Stringer, M. and Jones, B. Atypical combinationsand scientific impact. Science 342, 468-472 (2013).
3. Jones, B.F. The burden of knowledge and the 'death of the Renaissanceman': is innovation getting harder? Rev. Econ. Stud. 76, 283-317 (2009).
4. Sinatra, R., Deville, P., Szell, M., Wang, D. & Barabá si, A.-L. A century of physics. Nat. Phys. 11, 791-796 (2015).
5. Funk, R.J. and Owen-Smith, J. A dynamic network measure of technological change. Manage. Sci. 63, 791-817 (2017).
6. Moody, J. The structure of a social science collaboration network: disciplinary cohesion from 1963 to 1999. Am. Sociol. Rev. 69, 213-238 (2004).
7. Wang, D., Song, C. and Barabá si, A.-L. Quantifying long-term scientific impact. Science 342, 127-132 (2013).
8. Sun, Y. and Latora, V. The evolution of knowledge within and across fields in modern physics, arxiv: 2001.07199v1 (2020)
9. Sekara, V. Deville, P. Ahnert. S.E. Barabasi, A.-L. Sinatra. R. Lehman. S. The chaperone effect in scientific Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 115, 12603-12607 (2018).
10. Deville, P. Wang, D. Sinatra, R. Song, C. Blondel, V.D. and Barabasi, A.-L. Career on the move: Geography, Stratification and Scientific Impact. Scientific Reports 4, 4770 (2015)
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).0 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).0 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average
Citations provided by BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!- Max Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research Germany
- Max Planck Society Germany
- Max Planck Institute for Mathematics in the Sciences Germany
- Max Planck Institute for the History of Science Germany
- Max Planck Institute for the Physics of Complex Systems Germany
- Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History Germany
- Max Planck Institute for the Science of Light Germany
- Max Planck Society / Max Planck Institute for the Science of Light (MPL) Germany
- Technical University of Berlin Germany
- Technische Universität Berlin, Universitätsbibliothek Germany
- Sorbonne University Abu Dhabi United Arab Emirates
- Max Planck Institute for Mathematics in the Sciences Germany
- Tel Aviv University Israel
We investigated the evolution and transformation of scientific knowledge in the early modern period, analyzing more than 350 different editions of textbooks used for teaching astronomy in European universities from the late fifteenth century to mid-seventeenth century. These historical sources constitute the Sphaera Corpus. By examining different semantic relations among individual parts of each edition on record, we built a multiplex network consisting of six layers, as well as the aggregated network built from the superposition of all the layers. The network analysis reveals the emergence of five different communities. The contribution of each layer in shaping the communities and the properties of each community are studied. The most influential books in the corpus are found by calculating the average age of all the out-going and in-coming links for each book. A small group of editions is identified as a transmitter of knowledge as they bridge past knowledge to the future through a long temporal interval. Our analysis, moreover, identifies the most disruptive books. These books introduce new knowledge that is then adopted by almost all the books published afterwards until the end of the whole period of study. The historical research on the content of the identified books, as an empirical test, finally corroborates the results of all our analyses.
Comment: 19 pages, 9 figures