ИЗУЧЕНИЕ ВЛИЯНИЯ ИНОКУЛЯЦИИ RHIZOBIUM НА СОСТАВ СВОБОДНЫХ ФЕНОЛЬНЫХ КИСЛОТ В КОРНЯХ ЭТИОЛИРОВАННЫХ ПРОРОСТКОВ ГОРОХА

Article Russian OPEN
Макарова (Makarova), Людмила (Ljudmila) Евгеньевна (Evgen'evna) ; Дударева (Dudareva), Любовь (Ljubov') Виссарионовна (Vissarionovna) ; Соколова (Sokolova), Наталья (Natal'ja) Александровна (Aleksandrovna) ; Путилина (Putilina), Татьяна (Tat'jana) Егоровна (Egorovna) (2016)
  • Publisher: Altai State University
  • Journal: Khimiia rastitel'nogo syr'ia (Chemistry of plant raw material) (issn: 1029-5143)
  • Related identifiers: doi: 10.14258/jcprm.201601877
  • Subject: Pisum sativum L., Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. viceae , seedling, root, phenol-carbonic acid | Pisum sativum L., Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. viceae, корень, проросток, фенолкарбоновые кислоты
    mesheuropmc: food and beverages
With a view to study the reaction of pea plants (Pisum sativum L.) by inoculation with bacteria Rhizobium in extracts from the roots of etiolated seedlings obtained in two stages (using 80% ethanol and ethyl acetate), studied composition free of phenolcarboxylic acids (PCA). The results of the research components of extracts by different methods (paper chromatography, TLC, capillary electrophoresis, UV-and GC-MS-spectroscopy, etc.) have classified as PCA in their free form p-coumaric, o-coumaric, ferulic, benzoic, p-oxybenzoic, vanillic, gallic, gentisic, salicylic acids. To him is not yet listed ς-resorcylic acid, detected for the first time in the root extracts using of GC-MS method. Monitoring the composition of CBF in 5-mm pieces of roots, conducted by the method of GC-MS analysis revealed the influence of inoculation only on the localization of gentisic acid. The possibility of joint participation of salicylic and gentisic acids in the induction of root cell responses to inoculation of roots with bacteria  Rhizobium discussed.  
  • References (24)
    24 references, page 1 of 3

    1. Zaprometov M.N. Fenol'nye soedinenija: Rasprostranenie, metabolizm i funkcii v rastenijah. [Phenolic compounds: Distribution, metabolism and function in plants]. Moscow, 1993, 272 p. (in Russ.).

    2. Schütte H.R. Progress in Botany, 1978, vol. 40, pp. 126-149.

    3. Harborn Dzh.B., Simmonds N.U. Biohimija fenol'nyh soedinenij. [Biochemistry of phenolic compounds]. Moscow, 1968, pp. 70-108. (in Russ.).

    4. Gljan'ko A.K., Makarova L.E., Luzova G.B., Vasil'eva G.G., Mironova N.V. Fiziologija i biohimija kul'turnyh rastenij, 2004, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 124-130. (in Russ.).

    5. Makarova L.E., Smirnov V.I., Klyba L.V., Petrova I.G., Dudareva L.V. Prikladnaja biohimija i mikrobiologija, 2012, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 394-402. (in Russ.).

    6. Mijdla H.I., Haldre Y., Savisaar S. Uchenye zapiski Tartuskogo universiteta. 1975, vol. 4, no. 363, pp. 3-13. (in Russ.).

    7. Kefeli V.I. Prirodnye ingibitory rosta i fitogormony. [Natural growth inhibitors and plant hormones]. Moscow, 1974, 253 p. (in Russ.).

    8. Chigrin V.V., Rozum L.V., Zaprometov M.N. Fiziologija rastenij, 1973, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 942-948. (in Russ.).

    9. Chen, Z.X., Silva, H., Klessig D.F. Science. 1993, vol. 262, no. 5141, pp. 1883-1886.

    10. Alvarez M.E. Plant Molecular Biology, 2000, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 429-442.

  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark