Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Юрислингвистикаarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

The Evaluation Categories in the Disposition of Part 1 of Article 148 of Criminal Code of Russin Federation "Violation of Freedom of Worship”

The Evaluation Categories in the Disposition of Part 1 of Article 148 of Criminal Code of Russin Federation "Violation of Freedom of Worship”

Abstract

The article discusses the evaluation categories of the disposition of part 1 of article 148 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. The authors draw attention to the problem of the lack of any legal definitions of such categories as “insult”, “religious people”, “religious feelings”, “publicity” and contempt of society”. The doctrinal definitions of these categories are described in the article. The authors also remark some problems with these definitions from the legal point of view. The examples of particular legal cases are analyzed and the results of misinterpreting of the essences of the before mentioned terms by the law enforcement authorities are described. The authors compare the disposition of part 1 of article 148 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation with the dispositions of article 213 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation and article 5.26 of the Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative Offences. The authors suggest solutions to the problems discussed. For example, the idea of explaining some terms in the Resolutions of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation or in the Federal Law «On Freedom of Conscience and Religious Associations».

Статья посвящена анализу оценочных категорий ч. 1 ст. 148 УК РФ. Авторы отмечают отсутствие легального определения понятий «оскорбление», «верующие», «религиозные чувства», «публичность» и «неуважение к обществу». В статье предлагаются доктринальные толкования данных терминов и отмечаются неоднозначности этих трактовок с правовой точки зрения. В ходе анализа рассмотрены конкретные уголовные дела и выявлены результаты непонимания правоохранительными органами сущности некоторых наиболее значимых терминов. В статье авторы проводят сравнение диспозиции ч. 1 ст. 148 УК РФ и диспозиций ст. 213 УК РФ и ст. 5.26 КоАП РФ. Авторы предлагают возможные пути решения указанных проблем. В частности предлагается закрепление некоторых особенно дискуссионных понятий в специальных Постановлениях Пленума Верховного Суда РФ или же в Федеральном Законе «О свободе совести и религиозных объединениях».

Keywords

religio, верующие, оскорбление, публичность, contempt of society, неуважение к обществу, publicity, Уголовный Кодекс, ibsult, Criminal Code, религия, религиозные чувства, religious people, religious feelings

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average