Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Digital Library Univ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Archaism in Russian and Czech languages on the basis of work Tale of Igor´s Campaign

Authors: Pískačová, Magdalena;

Archaism in Russian and Czech languages on the basis of work Tale of Igor´s Campaign

Abstract

This Bachelor Thesis compares picked vocabulary pieces of Czech and Russian languages with emphasis on history, while leveraging on detailed assessment of The Tale of Igor's Campaign publications. The theoretic part of the Thesis engages in lexicology of both languages, picked vocabulary and chronological evolution of old Slavonic language. The practical part of the Bachelor Thesis compares selected words in number of its publications and highlights the meaning and origin of single words and their coincidence or difference in both languages in a scope of given words.

Tato bakalářská práce porovnává vybranou slovní zásobu českého a ruského jazyka se zaměřením na téma historie, přičemž se opírá o rozbor díla Slovo o pluku Igorově v několika různých redakcích. Teoretická část se zabývá lexikologií obou jazyků, slovní zásobou v obou jazycích a chronologickým vývojem praslovanštiny. Praktická část bakalářské práce srovnává vybraná jednotlivá slova v několika redakcích díla Slovo o pluku Igorově a poukazuje na význam a původ jednotlivých slov a na jejich shodnost či rozdílnost v obou jazycích v rámci daného slova.

Obhájeno

Country
Czech Republic
Related Organizations
Keywords

lexicology, slovní zásoba, historie, slovo o pluku igorově, the tale of igor's campaign, czech language, lexikologie, russian language, ruský jazyk, comparison, history, český jazyk, srovnání, picked vocabulary

1. 1 Lexikologie - vymezení základních pojmů .........................................................................6 1.1.1 Slovo jako základní lexikální jednotka slovní zásoby ..................................................7 1.1.2 Lexém jako formálně samostatná jednotka slovní zásoby...................................... 10 1.2 Charakteristika slovní zásoby ruského a českého jazyka ........................................... 14 1.3.1 Chronologický přehled vývoje praslovanštiny ............................................................ 19 1.3.2 Základní znaky praslovanštiny .......................................................................................... 20 2.1 Historický kontext díla Slovo o pluku Igorově ............................................................... 24 2.2 Analýza vybraných historických a archaických slov v díle Slovo o pluku Igorově ................................................................................................................................................................... 27 Полный церковно-славянский словарь. [online]. [citováno průběžně]. Dostupné z www: <http://www.orthodic.org/>.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
GOTRIPLE - Social Sciences and Humanities Discovery service