<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Contraction-level invariant surface electromyography pattern recognition introduces the decrease of training time and decreases the limitation of clinical prostheses. This study intended to examine whether a signal pre-processing method named frequency division technique (FDT) for online myoelectric pattern recognition classification is robust against contraction-level variation, and whether this pre-processing method has an advantage over traditional time-domain pattern recognition techniques even in the absence of muscle contraction-level variation. Eight healthy and naïve subjects performed wrist contractions during two degrees of freedom goal-oriented tasks, divided in three groups of type I, type II, and type III. The performance of these tasks, when the two different methods were used, was quantified by completion rate, completion time, throughput, efficiency, and overshoot. The traditional and the FDT method were compared in four runs, using combinations of normal or high muscle contraction level, and the traditional method or FDT. The results indicated that FDT had an advantage over traditional methods in the tested real-time myoelectric control tasks. FDT had a much better median completion rate of tasks (95%) compared to the traditional method (77.5%) among non-perfect runs, and the variability in FDT was strikingly smaller than the traditional method (p < 0.001). Moreover, the FDT method outperformed the traditional method in case of contraction-level variation between the training and online control phases (p = 0. 005 for throughput in type I tasks with normal contraction level, p = 0.006 for throughput in type II tasks, and p = 0.001 for efficiency with normal contraction level of all task types). This study shows that FDT provides advantages in online myoelectric control as it introduces robustness over contraction-level variations.
muscle contraction level, electromyography, Bioengineering and Biotechnology, robustness, online performance, myoelectric control
muscle contraction level, electromyography, Bioengineering and Biotechnology, robustness, online performance, myoelectric control
Al-Timemy A. Khushaba R. Bugmann G. Escudero J. (2015). Improving the performance against force variation of EMG controlled multifunctional upper-limb prostheses for transradial amputees. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 24, 650–661.10.1109/TNSRE.2015.2445634 [OpenAIRE] [DOI]
Ameri A. Kamavuako E. N. Scheme E. J. Englehart K. B. Parker P. A. (2014a). Support vector regression for improved real-time, simultaneous myoelectric control. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 22, 1198–1209.10.1109/TNSRE.2014.2323576 [OpenAIRE] [DOI]
Ameri A. Scheme E. J. Kamavuako E. N. Englehart K. B. Parker P. A. (2014b). Real-time, simultaneous myoelectric control using force and position-based training paradigms. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 61, 279–287.10.1109/TBME.2013.2281595 [DOI]
Fougner A. Scheme E. Chan A. D. C. Englehart K. StavdahlØ (2011). Resolving the limb position effect in myoelectric pattern recognition. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 19, 644–651.10.1109/TNSRE.2011.2163529 21846608 [OpenAIRE] [PubMed] [DOI]
He J. Zhang D. Jiang N. Sheng X. Farina D. Zhu X. (2015a). User adaptation in long-term, open-loop myoelectric training: implications for EMG pattern recognition in prosthesis control. J. Neural Eng. 12, 046005.10.1088/1741-2560/12/4/046005 [OpenAIRE] [DOI]
He J. Zhang D. Sheng X. Li S. Zhu X. (2015b). Invariant surface EMG feature against varying contraction level for myoelectric control based on muscle coordination. IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform. 19, 874–882.10.1109/JBHI.2014.2330356 [DOI]
Henneman E. Somjen G. Carpenter D. O. (1965). Functional significance of cell size in spinal motoneurons. J. Neurophysiol. 28, 560–580.
Hudgins B. Parker P. Scott R. (1993). A new strategy for multifunction myoelectric control. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 40.8468080 [OpenAIRE] [PubMed]
Jiang N. Dosen S. Muller K. R. Farina D. (2012). Myoelectric control of artificial limbs: is there a need to change focus? [In the spotlight]. IEEE Signal Process. Magazine 29, 150–152.10.1109/msp.2012.2203480 [OpenAIRE] [DOI]
Jiang N. Lorrain T. Farina D. (2014a). A state-based, proportional myoelectric control method: online validation and comparison with the clinical state-of-the-art. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 11, 110.10.1186/1743-0003-11-110 [OpenAIRE] [DOI]
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |