Distinguishing Radiculopathies from Mononeuropathies
Distinguishing Radiculopathies from Mononeuropathies
Identifying “where is the lesion” is particularly important in the approach to the patient with focal dysfunction where a peripheral localization is suspected. This article outlines a methodical approach to the neuromuscular patient in distinguishing focal neuropathies versus radiculopathies, both of which are common presentations to the neurology clinic. This approach begins with evaluation of the sensory examination to determine whether there are irritative or negative sensory signs in a peripheral nerve or dermatomal distribution. This is followed by evaluation of deep tendon reflexes to evaluate if differential hyporeflexia can assist in the two localizations. Finally, identification of weak muscle groups unique to a nerve or myotomal pattern in the proximal and distal extremities can most reliably assist in a precise localization. The article concludes with an application of the described method to the common scenario of distinguishing radial neuropathy versus C7 radiculopathy in the setting of a wrist drop and provides additional examples for self-evaluation and reference.
nerve root, focal neuropathy, mononeuropathy, neuromuscular, radiculopathy, Neuroscience
nerve root, focal neuropathy, mononeuropathy, neuromuscular, radiculopathy, Neuroscience
1912
1 Wilbourn AJ Aminoff MJ. AAEE minimonograph #32: the electrophysiologic examination in patients with radiculopathies. Muscle Nerve (1988) 11(11):1099–114.10.1002/mus.880111102 [OpenAIRE] [DOI]
2 Stoll G Wilder-Smith E Bendszus M. Imaging of the peripheral nervous system. Handb Clin Neurol (2013) 115:137–53.10.1016/B978-0-444-52902-2.00008-4 23931778 [OpenAIRE] [PubMed] [DOI]
3 Stewart JD. Foot drop: where, why and what to do? Pract Neurol (2008) 8(3):158–69.10.1136/jnnp.2008.149393 18502948 [OpenAIRE] [PubMed] [DOI]
4 Alport AR Sander HW. Clinical approach to peripheral neuropathy: anatomic localization and diagnostic testing. Continuum (2012) 18(1):13–38.10.1212/01.CON.0000411546.13207.b1 22810068 [OpenAIRE] [PubMed] [DOI]
5 Barohn RJ Amato AA. Pattern-recognition approach to neuropathy and neuronopathy. Neurol Clin (2013) 31(2):343–61.10.1016/j.ncl.2013.02.001 23642713 [OpenAIRE] [PubMed] [DOI]
6 McGillicuddy JE. Cervical radiculopathy, entrapment neuropathy, and thoracic outlet syndrome: how to differentiate? J Neurosurg (2004) 1(2):179–87.10.3171/spi.2004.1.2.0179 [OpenAIRE] [DOI]
7 Overell JR. Peripheral neuropathy: pattern recognition for the pragmatist. Pract Neurol (2011) 11(2):62–70.10.1136/jnnp.2011.241612 21385962 [OpenAIRE] [PubMed] [DOI]
8 Saunders WB. Aids to the Examination of the Peripheral Nervous System. London: Saunders Ltd (2000).
9 Hughes R. Peripheral nerve diseases: the bare essentials. Pract Neurol (2008) 8(6):396–405.10.1136/jnnp.2008.162412 [OpenAIRE] [DOI]
10 Shabat S Leitner Y David R Folman Y. The correlation between Spurling test and imaging studies in detecting cervical radiculopathy. J Neuroimaging (2012) 22(4):375–8.10.1111/j.1552-6569.2011.00644.x 21883627 [OpenAIRE] [PubMed] [DOI]
- 1
- 2
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).0 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average
Citations provided by BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!