- Publication . Article . Other literature type . 2021Open Access EnglishAuthors:Marion Drut; Federico Antonioli; Michael J. Böhm; Ruzica Brečić; Liesbeth Dries; Hugo Ferrer-Pérez; Lisa Gauvrit; Việt Hoàng; Kamilla Knutsen Steinnes; Apichaya Lilavanichakul; +14 moreMarion Drut; Federico Antonioli; Michael J. Böhm; Ruzica Brečić; Liesbeth Dries; Hugo Ferrer-Pérez; Lisa Gauvrit; Việt Hoàng; Kamilla Knutsen Steinnes; Apichaya Lilavanichakul; Edward Majewski; Orachos Napasintuwong; An Nguyen; Konstadinos Mattas; Bojan Ristic; Burkhard Schaer; Torvald Tangeland; Marina Tomić Maksan; Peter Csillag; Áron Török; Efthimia Tsakiridou; Mario Veneziani; Gunnar Vittersø; Valentin Bellassen;
handle: 10642/9540
Publisher: HAL CCSDCountries: France, Netherlands, Norway, CroatiaProject: EC | Strength2Food (678024)This paper estimates the foodmiles (embedded distances) and transport-related carbon emissions of 27 Food Quality Scheme (FQS) products – Protected Designation of Origin (PDO), Protected Geographical Indications (PGI) and organic – and their reference products. It goes further than the existing literature by adopting a value chain perspective, instead of the traditional consumer perspective, and focusing on FQS products. The same methodology is applied across all the case studies. The article specifically investigates the determinants of differences between FQS and their references. FQS products travel significantly shorter distances (−30%) and generate significantly lower transport-related emissions (−23%) than conventional food products. The differences are even greater for vegetal and organic products. The relationship between distance and transport-related emissions is not exactly proportional and highlights the importance of transport modes and logistics, in particular for exports and imports. Finally, we stress the importance of the spatial distribution of the different stages in the value chains (e.g. production, processing). PDO technical specifications delimit a geographical area for production and processing, thereby limiting distances and transport-related emissions compared to conventional food products, but also compared to other types of FQS. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 678024.
Average popularityAverage popularity In bottom 99%Average influencePopularity: Citation-based measure reflecting the current impact.Average influence In bottom 99%Influence: Citation-based measure reflecting the total impact.add Add to ORCIDPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
1 Research products, page 1 of 1
Loading
- Publication . Article . Other literature type . 2021Open Access EnglishAuthors:Marion Drut; Federico Antonioli; Michael J. Böhm; Ruzica Brečić; Liesbeth Dries; Hugo Ferrer-Pérez; Lisa Gauvrit; Việt Hoàng; Kamilla Knutsen Steinnes; Apichaya Lilavanichakul; +14 moreMarion Drut; Federico Antonioli; Michael J. Böhm; Ruzica Brečić; Liesbeth Dries; Hugo Ferrer-Pérez; Lisa Gauvrit; Việt Hoàng; Kamilla Knutsen Steinnes; Apichaya Lilavanichakul; Edward Majewski; Orachos Napasintuwong; An Nguyen; Konstadinos Mattas; Bojan Ristic; Burkhard Schaer; Torvald Tangeland; Marina Tomić Maksan; Peter Csillag; Áron Török; Efthimia Tsakiridou; Mario Veneziani; Gunnar Vittersø; Valentin Bellassen;
handle: 10642/9540
Publisher: HAL CCSDCountries: France, Netherlands, Norway, CroatiaProject: EC | Strength2Food (678024)This paper estimates the foodmiles (embedded distances) and transport-related carbon emissions of 27 Food Quality Scheme (FQS) products – Protected Designation of Origin (PDO), Protected Geographical Indications (PGI) and organic – and their reference products. It goes further than the existing literature by adopting a value chain perspective, instead of the traditional consumer perspective, and focusing on FQS products. The same methodology is applied across all the case studies. The article specifically investigates the determinants of differences between FQS and their references. FQS products travel significantly shorter distances (−30%) and generate significantly lower transport-related emissions (−23%) than conventional food products. The differences are even greater for vegetal and organic products. The relationship between distance and transport-related emissions is not exactly proportional and highlights the importance of transport modes and logistics, in particular for exports and imports. Finally, we stress the importance of the spatial distribution of the different stages in the value chains (e.g. production, processing). PDO technical specifications delimit a geographical area for production and processing, thereby limiting distances and transport-related emissions compared to conventional food products, but also compared to other types of FQS. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 678024.
Average popularityAverage popularity In bottom 99%Average influencePopularity: Citation-based measure reflecting the current impact.Average influence In bottom 99%Influence: Citation-based measure reflecting the total impact.add Add to ORCIDPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.