• Publicationsclose
• Research dataclose
• Research softwareclose
• Other literature type close
• Conference object close
• Hebrew close
• Hyper Article en Ligne close
• Hyper Article en Ligne - Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société close
• Hal-Diderot close
• HAL-ENS-LYON close

National audience

International audience

International audience; According to Socrates in his Historia ecclesiastica (P. G. 67, col. 101-104), during a session of Nicea’s Council, the question of perpetual celibacy for the members of the clergy was raised. Most of the bishops were in favour of such a status. Suddenly, a venerable old and holy man whose name was Paphnutius, an ascetic and himself a perpetual continent, stood up and declared to the assembly: “Do not enact an enactment (Greek: kanon) which nobody can bear”The similarity between that statement and the well-known talmudic saying: “We should not impose an enactment upon the community unless the majority of the community will be able to abide it” (T. B. Babba Qama, 79b, a.s.o.), is striking enough to justify an attempt to check if we could speak of a Jewish influence upon Christian ways of expression, at that time.The inquiry is based upon rabbinic sources, on one hand, and Greek and Syriac Christian sources, on another hand. The comparison is made from two standpoints: that of the form (philological point-of-view) and that of the contents (religious point-of-view), with regard to the specificity of both institutions, the Christian and the Jewish ones.

International audience

International audience

Following the pattern of Marie-Dominique Chenu’s La théologie comme science au XIIIe siècle is researched here the link between theology and science according to Jewish medieval theologians (Saadia Gaon, Judah ha-Levi, Maimonides, Gersonides, Hasdai Crescas and Joseph Albo), beginning with definitions by Bahya Ibn Paquda, Maimonides and the Israeli scholar Dov Schwartz and using the following criteria : what the « truth » of the Revelation means ; the way the Holy Writ expresses its teachings ; the nature of its « wisdom » ; dialectical discourse and truth ; logical nature and role of the so-called principles of faith ; the use of logics in the theological discourse. There exists a watershed of sorts between those thinkers according to which the contents of Revelation and (Aristotelian) science were the same (using other words and a different order), notwithstanding a few apparent incompatibilities, and those who thought that the two forms of knowledge were deeply different.

International audience