
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Replication Package for the paper "Technical Debt in the Peer-Review Documentation of R Packages: a rOpenSci Case Study" (MSR '21). # Scripts: Data Collection and Processing These are the scripts used to extract the data from _rOpenSci_. The following steps indicate how to use them. 1. Add all attached R files into an R project. 2. Install the following R packages. Moreover, the process also requires to have a working GitHub account, in order to obtain the corresponding token. ```{r} library(dplyr) library(stringr) library(stringi) library(jsonlite) library(httpuv) library(httr) library(ggplot2) library(tidyr) ```' 3. All the individual functions on the following files should be sourced into the R Environment: `getToken.R`, `comments.R`, `issues.R`, and `tagging.R`. 4. Run the script located on the file `process.R`. This will run all the previous functions in the corresponding order. # Datasets The following files are included: -Dataset_1-100_Author1.xlsx contains the randomly selected 100 comments that were classified according to TD types by Author 1. -Dataset_1-100_Author2.xlsx contains the randomly selected 100 comments that were classified according to TD types by Author 2 and the combined classification (in blue) after discussion. -Dataset_Phrases_Both.xlsx contains the randomly selected 358 comments (resulting in 602 phrases) that were classified according to TD types by both authors 1 and 2. Their classification was incorporated into a single spreadsheet side by side for easy comparison. Disagreement was discussed and final classification is in the “Agreement” field. -UserRoles.csv contains the user roles associated with the 600 phrases. The “comment_id” is the unique identifier for the comment from which the phrase is extracted. The phrase is represented in the “statement” field. The “agreement” field shows the final technical debt label after the analysis by two of the authors. The user roles are shown in the “user_role” column.
TD types, Peer-Review Documentation, Science Policy, ldquo, Information Systems not elsewhere classified, phrase, MSR, rOpenSci Case Study Replication Package, Plant Biology, 028, Cell Biology, user roles, R Packages, classification, 100 comments, Cancer, Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified, Dataset
TD types, Peer-Review Documentation, Science Policy, ldquo, Information Systems not elsewhere classified, phrase, MSR, rOpenSci Case Study Replication Package, Plant Biology, 028, Cell Biology, user roles, R Packages, classification, 100 comments, Cancer, Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified, Dataset
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
views | 132 | |
downloads | 22 |